Literature DB >> 15011932

Estimating risk reduction required to break even in a health promotion program.

Ronald J Ozminkowski1, Ron Z Goetzel, Jan Santoro, Betty-Jo Saenz, Christine Eley, Bob Gorsky.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To illustrate a formula to estimate the amount of risk reduction required to break even on a corporate health promotion program.
DESIGN: A case study design was implemented. Base year (2001) health risk and medical expenditure data from the company, along with published information on the relationships between employee demographics, health risks, and medical expenditures, were used to forecast demographics, risks, and expenditures for 2002 through 2011 and estimate the required amount of risk reduction.
SETTING: Motorola.
SUBJECTS: 52,124 domestic employees. MEASURES: Demographics included age, gender, race, and job type. Health risks for 2001 were measured via health risk appraisal. Risks were noted as either high or low and related to exercise/eating habits, body weight, blood pressure, blood sugar levels, cholesterol levels, depression, stress, smoking/drinking habits, and seat belt use. Medical claims for 2001 were used to calculate medical expenditures per employee.
RESULTS: Assuming a dollar 282 per employee program cost, Motorola employees would need to reduce their lifestyle-related health risks by 1.08% to 1.42% per year to break even on health promotion programming, depending upon the discount rate. Higher or lower program investments would change the risk reduction percentages.
CONCLUSION: Employers can use information from published studies, along with their own data, to estimate the amount of risk reduction required to break even on their health promotion programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15011932     DOI: 10.4278/0890-1171-18.4.316

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Health Promot        ISSN: 0890-1171


  3 in total

1.  Health care costs and participation in a community-based health promotion program for older adults.

Authors:  Charles Mayer; Barbara Williams; Edward H Wagner; James P LoGerfo; Allen Cheadle; Elizabeth A Phelan
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2010-02-15       Impact factor: 2.830

2.  Do work relationships matter? Characteristics of workplace interactions that enhance or detract from employee perceptions of well-being and health behaviors.

Authors:  Karen Mastroianni; Julia Storberg-Walker
Journal:  Health Psychol Behav Med       Date:  2014-08-11

3.  The well-being valuation model: a method for monetizing the nonmarket good of individual well-being.

Authors:  James A Sidney; Ashlin Jones; Carter Coberley; James E Pope; Aaron Wells
Journal:  Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol       Date:  2016-10-25
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.