PURPOSE: To test the effectiveness of a video to teach patients about prostate cancer screening and treatment in a clinic setting. METHODS: A staged, two-group, pretest-posttest quasi-experimental design was used. Questionnaires were completed before and after a routine doctor's appointment in a Veteran's Administration clinic. The experimental group (n = 52) viewed the video, and the control group (n = 52) received usual care only. The two groups were similar in age, education, race, and quality of life. RESULTS: Knowledge increased significantly from pretest to posttest for the experimental group, but not for the control group (p < .001). More patients in the experimental group changed their preference for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening (31% experimental vs. 2% control, p = .002), indicating the patients were impacted by the information presented. Viewing the video did not stimulate increased discussion with the physician or lengthen appointment time. CONCLUSION: The video was effective in improving knowledge about a complex topic and changing some patients' preference for PSA testing without frightening or confusing patients.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To test the effectiveness of a video to teach patients about prostate cancer screening and treatment in a clinic setting. METHODS: A staged, two-group, pretest-posttest quasi-experimental design was used. Questionnaires were completed before and after a routine doctor's appointment in a Veteran's Administration clinic. The experimental group (n = 52) viewed the video, and the control group (n = 52) received usual care only. The two groups were similar in age, education, race, and quality of life. RESULTS: Knowledge increased significantly from pretest to posttest for the experimental group, but not for the control group (p < .001). More patients in the experimental group changed their preference for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening (31% experimental vs. 2% control, p = .002), indicating the patients were impacted by the information presented. Viewing the video did not stimulate increased discussion with the physician or lengthen appointment time. CONCLUSION: The video was effective in improving knowledge about a complex topic and changing some patients' preference for PSA testing without frightening or confusing patients.
Authors: Sunil Kripalani; Jyoti Sharma; Elizabeth Justice; Jeb Justice; Cynthia Spiker; Larry E Laufman; Megan Price; Armin D Weinberg; Terry A Jacobson Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Omotola S Ashorobi; Jacqueline Frost; Xuemei Wang; Pamela Roberson; E Lin; Robert J Volk; David S Lopez; Lovell A Jones; Curtis A Pettaway Journal: Am J Mens Health Date: 2016-07-08
Authors: Jennifer D Allen; Megan K D Othus; Alton Hart; Laura Tom; Yi Li; Donna Berry; Deborah Bowen Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2010-08-17 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Caroline S Dorfman; Randi M Williams; Elisabeth C Kassan; Sara N Red; David L Dawson; William Tuong; Elizabeth R Parker; Janet Ohene-Frempong; Kimberly M Davis; Alexander H Krist; Steven H Woolf; Marc D Schwartz; Mary B Fishman; Carmella Cole; Kathryn L Taylor Journal: BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Date: 2010-03-03 Impact factor: 2.796
Authors: Gary L Ellison; Sally P Weinrich; Mimi Lou; Hongyan Xu; Isaac J Powell; Claudia R Baquet Journal: J Natl Med Assoc Date: 2008-10 Impact factor: 1.798
Authors: Masahito Jimbo; Gurpreet K Rana; Sarah Hawley; Margaret Holmes-Rovner; Karen Kelly-Blake; Donald E Nease; Mack T Ruffin Journal: CA Cancer J Clin Date: 2013-03-15 Impact factor: 508.702