Literature DB >> 15011250

Pattern recognition strategies for molecular surfaces: III. Binding site prediction with a neural network.

Matthias Keil1, Thomas E Exner, Jürgen Brickmann.   

Abstract

An algorithm for the identification of possible binding sites of biomolecules, which are represented as regions of the molecular surface, is introduced. The algorithm is based on the segmentation of the molecular surface into overlapping patches as described in the first article of this series.1 The properties of these patches (calculated on the basis of physical and chemical properties) are used for the analysis of the molecular surfaces of 7821 proteins and protein complexes. Special attention is drawn to known protein binding sites. A binding site identification algorithm is realized on the basis of the calculated data using a neural network strategy. The neural network is able to classify surface patches as protein-protein, protein-DNA, protein-ligand, or nonbinding sites. To show the capability of the algorithm, results of the surface analysis and the predictions are presented and discussed with representative examples. Copyright 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Comput Chem 25: 779-789, 2004

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15011250     DOI: 10.1002/jcc.10361

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Chem        ISSN: 0192-8651            Impact factor:   3.376


  16 in total

1.  Are predefined decoy sets of ligand poses able to quantify scoring function accuracy?

Authors:  Oliver Korb; Tim Ten Brink; Fredrick Robin Devadoss Victor Paul Raj; Matthias Keil; Thomas E Exner
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 3.686

2.  Coevolution at protein complex interfaces can be detected by the complementarity trace with important impact for predictive docking.

Authors:  Hocine Madaoui; Raphaël Guerois
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-05-29       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Biophysical limits of protein-ligand binding.

Authors:  Richard D Smith; Alaina L Engdahl; James B Dunbar; Heather A Carlson
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 4.956

4.  Structural conservation in band 4.1, ezrin, radixin, moesin (FERM) domains as a guide to identify inhibitors of the proline-rich tyrosine kinase 2.

Authors:  Nathalie Meurice; Lei Wang; Christopher A Lipinski; Zhongbo Yang; Christopher Hulme; Joseph C Loftus
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2010-01-28       Impact factor: 7.446

5.  DNABINDPROT: fluctuation-based predictor of DNA-binding residues within a network of interacting residues.

Authors:  Pemra Ozbek; Seren Soner; Burak Erman; Turkan Haliloglu
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-05-16       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Structural properties of non-traditional drug targets present new challenges for virtual screening.

Authors:  Ragul Gowthaman; Eric J Deeds; John Karanicolas
Journal:  J Chem Inf Model       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 4.956

7.  DR_bind: a web server for predicting DNA-binding residues from the protein structure based on electrostatics, evolution and geometry.

Authors:  Yao Chi Chen; Jon D Wright; Carmay Lim
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  iDNA-Prot: identification of DNA binding proteins using random forest with grey model.

Authors:  Wei-Zhong Lin; Jian-An Fang; Xuan Xiao; Kuo-Chen Chou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Predicting DNA-binding sites of proteins from amino acid sequence.

Authors:  Changhui Yan; Michael Terribilini; Feihong Wu; Robert L Jernigan; Drena Dobbs; Vasant Honavar
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-05-19       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Structural motifs recurring in different folds recognize the same ligand fragments.

Authors:  Gabriele Ausiello; Pier Federico Gherardini; Elena Gatti; Ottaviano Incani; Manuela Helmer-Citterich
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.