Literature DB >> 15010443

Sex differences in outcomes after cardiac catheterization: effect modification by treatment strategy and time.

Kathryn M King1, William A Ghali, Peter D Faris, Michael J Curtis, P Diane Galbraith, Michelle M Graham, Merril L Knudtson.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Studies comparing outcomes of cardiac care in women vs men yield various results, with some suggesting worse outcomes for women and others suggesting equivalent outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether extent of coronary disease, treatment strategy, and follow-up time influence the risk of death in women vs men among patients who have had cardiac catheterization. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: We studied a large inception cohort by using detailed clinical data from a registry of 37 401 patients undergoing cardiac catheterization in Alberta, Canada, from 1995-2000, with follow-up through December 31, 2001. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The risk of death for women vs men was assessed for all patients combined and then in analyses stratified by degree of coronary anatomic risk and by treatment strategy (no revascularization, percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI], coronary artery bypass graft [CABG] surgery). The latter analysis included a graphic assessment of the changing relative risk over time for women vs men.
RESULTS: Women had higher 1-year mortality than men did (5.6% vs 4.6%; P<.001). However, stratified analyses demonstrated that sex differences in risk occurred only early after catheterization and were most apparent among patients undergoing revascularization. The early risk-adjusted relative risks for women vs men were elevated at 3.49 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.95-6.24) for CABG surgery and 2.38 (95% CI, 1.48-3.83) for PCI on day 1 after catheterization, with a subsequent decrease in relative risk over time to equivalence in risk between sexes before 1 year.
CONCLUSIONS: Sex-based differences in death rates after cardiac catheterization are time- and treatment-specific. This finding may at least partially explain the discrepancies in results from earlier studies on sex differences in outcomes of cardiac care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15010443     DOI: 10.1001/jama.291.10.1220

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  22 in total

1.  Referrals in acute coronary events for CARdiac catheterization: The RACE CAR trial.

Authors:  Catherine Kreatsoulas; Debi Sloane; Janice Pogue; James L Velianou; Sonia S Anand
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.223

Review 2.  A comprehensive view of sex-specific issues related to cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Louise Pilote; Kaberi Dasgupta; Veena Guru; Karin H Humphries; Jennifer McGrath; Colleen Norris; Doreen Rabi; Johanne Tremblay; Arsham Alamian; Tracie Barnett; Jafna Cox; William Amin Ghali; Sherry Grace; Pavel Hamet; Teresa Ho; Susan Kirkland; Marie Lambert; Danielle Libersan; Jennifer O'Loughlin; Gilles Paradis; Milan Petrovich; Vicky Tagalakis
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Risk-taking attitudes and their association with process and outcomes of cardiac care: a cohort study.

Authors:  Kathryn M King; Colleen M Norris; Merril L Knudtson; William A Ghali
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2009-08-06       Impact factor: 2.298

4.  The relationship between body mass index, treatment, and mortality in patients with established coronary artery disease: a report from APPROACH.

Authors:  Antigone Oreopoulos; Finlay A McAlister; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh; Raj Padwal; Justin A Ezekowitz; Arya M Sharma; Csaba P Kovesdy; Gregg C Fonarow; Colleen M Norris
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2009-07-16       Impact factor: 29.983

5.  Sex differences in independent factors associated with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Alois Suessenbacher; Maria Wanitschek; Jakob Dörler; Sabrina Neururer; Matthias Frick; Otmar Pachinger; Hannes F W Alber
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2014-09-13       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 6.  Acute coronary syndromes in women: is treatment different? Should it be?

Authors:  Susan K Bennett; Rita F Redberg
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.931

7.  Sex, socioeconomic status, access to cardiac catheterization, and outcomes for acute coronary syndromes in the context of universal healthcare coverage.

Authors:  Gabriel E Fabreau; Alexander A Leung; Danielle A Southern; Merrill L Knudtson; J Michael McWilliams; John Z Ayanian; William A Ghali
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2014-06-03

8.  Patient sex does not modify ejection fraction as a predictor of death in heart failure: insights from the APPROACH cohort.

Authors:  Heidi N Schmaltz; Danielle A Southern; Colleen J Maxwell; Merril L Knudtson; William A Ghali
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-10-02       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 9.  Sex/gender medicine. The biological basis for personalized care in cardiovascular medicine.

Authors:  Faisal A Arain; Fatima H Kuniyoshi; Ahmed D Abdalrhim; Virginia M Miller
Journal:  Circ J       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 2.993

10.  Women with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy have worse survival.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Geske; Kevin C Ong; Konstantinos C Siontis; Virginia B Hebl; Michael J Ackerman; David O Hodge; Virginia M Miller; Rick A Nishimura; Jae K Oh; Hartzell V Schaff; Bernard J Gersh; Steve R Ommen
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 29.983

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.