Literature DB >> 15010231

Auditory comprehension: is multiple choice really good enough?

Elisabeth L Breese1, Argye E Hillis.   

Abstract

Auditory comprehension is commonly measured with multiple choice tasks. The sensitivity of these tasks in identifying deficits, however, is limited by credit given for correct guesses by forced choice. In this study, we compare performance on the multiple choice task to an alternative word/picture verification task, in 122 subjects with acute left hemisphere stroke. As predicted, word/picture verification identifies significantly more subjects with deficits in auditory comprehension. Furthermore, the pattern of errors in the two tasks is consistent with a current distributed model of semantic memory, and inconsistent with alternative local models.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15010231     DOI: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00412-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Lang        ISSN: 0093-934X            Impact factor:   2.381


  15 in total

1.  Contrasting effects of errorless naming treatment and gestural facilitation for word retrieval in aphasia.

Authors:  Anastasia M Raymer; Beth McHose; Kimberly G Smith; Lisa Iman; Alexis Ambrose; Colleen Casselton
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rehabil       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 2.868

2.  The functional neuroanatomy of language.

Authors:  Gregory Hickok
Journal:  Phys Life Rev       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Important considerations in lesion-symptom mapping: Illustrations from studies of word comprehension.

Authors:  Hinna Shahid; Rajani Sebastian; Tatiana T Schnur; Taylor Hanayik; Amy Wright; Donna C Tippett; Julius Fridriksson; Chris Rorden; Argye E Hillis
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Neural processing critical for distinguishing between speech sounds.

Authors:  Kevin Kim; Luke Adams; Lynsey M Keator; Shannon M Sheppard; Bonnie L Breining; Chris Rorden; Julius Fridriksson; Leonardo Bonilha; Corianne Rogalsky; Tracy Love; Gregory Hickok; Argye E Hillis
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  Tracking reorganization of large-scale effective connectivity in aphasia following right hemisphere stroke.

Authors:  David W Gow; Seppo P Ahlfors
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  Phonotactic processing deficit following left-hemisphere stroke.

Authors:  Maryam Ghaleh; Laura M Skipper-Kallal; Shihui Xing; Elizabeth Lacey; Iain DeWitt; Andrew DeMarco; Peter Turkeltaub
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 4.027

Review 7.  Regional Brain Dysfunction Associated with Semantic Errors in Comprehension.

Authors:  Hinna Shahid; Rajani Sebastian; Donna C Tippett; Sadhvi Saxena; Amy Wright; Taylor Hanayik; Bonnie Breining; Leonardo Bonilha; Julius Fridriksson; Chris Rorden; Argye E Hillis
Journal:  Semin Speech Lang       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 1.761

8.  Auditory word comprehension impairment in acute stroke: relative contribution of phonemic versus semantic factors.

Authors:  Corianne Rogalsky; Eleanor Pitz; Argye E Hillis; Gregory Hickok
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2008-09-26       Impact factor: 2.381

9.  Where (in the brain) do semantic errors come from?

Authors:  Lauren Cloutman; Rebecca Gottesman; Priyanka Chaudhry; Cameron Davis; Jonathan T Kleinman; Mikolaj Pawlak; Edward H Herskovits; Vijay Kannan; Andrew Lee; Melissa Newhart; Jennifer Heidler-Gary; Argye E Hillis
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2008-11-12       Impact factor: 4.027

10.  Bilateral capacity for speech sound processing in auditory comprehension: evidence from Wada procedures.

Authors:  G Hickok; K Okada; W Barr; J Pa; C Rogalsky; K Donnelly; L Barde; A Grant
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 2.381

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.