| Literature DB >> 15009864 |
Peter M Kistler1, Simon P Fynn, Harry G Mond, Norman Eizenberg.
Abstract
The traditional pulse generator implantation site lies subcutaneous on the fascia of the pectoralis major muscle. This article describes a subpectoral pocket approach, which on anatomic investigation is actually "intrapectoral" and offers a much improved cosmetic result with the potential advantage of less erosion. In the authors' experience with over 1000 initial pacemaker implants and pulse generator replacements, the potential concerns of neurovascular and muscular damage have not been realized. There has been no pulse generator damage from the ribs, serious loculated hematomas, or unusual postoperative or chronic pain. From experience with pulse generator recalls, the replacement procedure has not been significantly more difficult than with the subcutaneous approach. The intrapectoral approach has now become the authors' routine in patients without significant adipose tissue overlying the pectoralis major muscle.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2004 PMID: 15009864 DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2004.00442.x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol ISSN: 0147-8389 Impact factor: 1.976