Literature DB >> 15009860

Sequential biventricular pacing: evaluation of safety and efficacy.

Peter T Mortensen1, Peter Sogaard, Hassan Mansour, Jean Ponsonaille, Daniel Gras, Arnaud Lazarus, Wolfgang Reiser, Christine Alonso, Cecilia M Linde, Maurizio Lunati, Berthold Kramm, E Mark Harrison.   

Abstract

The study evaluated the clinical safety, performance, and efficacy of sequential biventricular pacing in the InSync III (Model 8042) biventricular stimulator in a multicenter, prospective 3-month study and assessed the proper functioning of features aiming at improving biventricular AV therapy delivery. The system was successfully implanted in 189 (95.9%) of 198 patients with symptomatic systolic heart failure and a prolonged QRS complex duration. Patients significantly improved their 6-minute hall walk distance (baseline 339 +/- 92 vs 3-month 422 +/- 127 meter, P < 0.001) and NYHA class (baseline 3.1 +/- 0.5 vs 3-month 1.9 +/- 0.7, P < 0.001). Echocardiographic optimization of sequential biventricular pacing showed an improvement in stroke volume compared to simultaneous stimulation (sequential 68 +/- 24 mL vs simultaneous 56 +/- 23 mL, P < 0.001) at baseline and at 3 months. In 88% (30/34) of the patients these improvements were seen within a small range of V-V delays of +/-20 ms and in 94% (32/34) within V-V delays of +/-40 ms. In contrast, programming beyond this range reduced stroke volume below that during simultaneous biventricular pacing. The device functioned as expected. LV lead dislodgement was observed in 12 patients and phrenic nerve stimulation required lead repositioning in 2 patients. Eight patients died during the study. Patient survival at 3 and 6 months was 97 +/- 2% and 94 +/- 2%, respectively. Cause of death was cardiac (n = 7), heart failure related (n = 3), arrhythmia related (n = 2), and unknown (n = 2). In conclusion, this sequential biventricular pacemaker was safe and efficacious.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15009860     DOI: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2004.00438.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pacing Clin Electrophysiol        ISSN: 0147-8389            Impact factor:   1.976


  10 in total

1.  Optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy after implantation.

Authors:  Ayesha Hasan; William T Abraham
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2008-08

Review 2.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy: strategies for device programming, troubleshooting and follow-up.

Authors:  Safwat Gassis; Angel R León
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.900

3.  The reliability of cardiogenic impedance and correlation with echocardiographic and plethysmographic parameters for predicting CRT time intervals post implantation.

Authors:  Elena Sciaraffia; Matthew R Ginks; John Gustafsson; Andreas Karlsson; C Aldo Rinaldi; Carina Blomström Lundqvist
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-04-27       Impact factor: 1.900

4.  Electrocardiographic follow-up of biventricular pacemakers.

Authors:  S Serge Barold; Bengt Herweg; Michael Giudici
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 5.  Strategies for pacemaker programming in acute heart failure.

Authors:  Marc K Lahiri; Justin T Mao; Claudio D Schuger
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.214

6.  Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy for Heart Failure.

Authors:  Heather M. Ross; Dusan Z. Kocovic
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2004-10

Review 7.  Atrioventricular and interventricular delay optimization in cardiac resynchronization therapy: physiological principles and overview of available methods.

Authors:  Patrick Houthuizen; Frank A L E Bracke; Berry M van Gelder
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.214

8.  Echo-driven V-V optimization determines clinical improvement in non responders to cardiac resynchronization treatment.

Authors:  Tasneem Z Naqvi; Asim M Rafique; C Thomas Peter
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2006-10-18       Impact factor: 2.062

9.  Validation of a peak endocardial acceleration-based algorithm to optimize cardiac resynchronization: early clinical results.

Authors:  Peter Paul Delnoy; Emanuela Marcelli; Henk Oudeluttikhuis; Deborah Nicastia; Fabrizio Renesto; Laura Cercenelli; Gianni Plicchi
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2008-05-19       Impact factor: 5.214

10.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy during rest and exercise: comparison of two optimization methods.

Authors:  Cinzia Valzania; Maria J Eriksson; Giuseppe Boriani; Fredrik Gadler
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 5.214

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.