Literature DB >> 15009120

Early development and segment formation in the centipede, Strigamia maritima (Geophilomorpha).

Ariel D Chipman1, Wallace Arthur, Michael Akam.   

Abstract

Geophilomorph centipedes exhibit a number of unique characteristics that make them of particular developmental and evolutionary interest. Segment numbers in geophilomorphs are higher than in any other centipedes, ranging from 27 to 191. They may be constant within a species, presenting in extreme form the "counting" problem in development, or they may vary--a situation that provides us with the opportunity to study naturally occurring variation in segment numbers. All their segments are generated during embryogenesis, a situation unlike that in the more basal centipede orders, which generate only a fraction of their 15 trunk segments in the embryo and develop the rest postembryonically. Here we provide a foundation for further developmental studies of the Geophilomorpha, building on the one study that has been conducted to date, on the coastal species Strigamia maritima. Development begins with the migration of nuclei to the surface of the egg, which then condense to form an embryonic rudiment of more than 20,000 cells, covering an entire hemisphere. During early development, the embryo can be divided into two distinct areas: a large terminal disc of apparently undifferentiated tissue and the germ-band, which has a clear anteroposterior axis and differentiated segments. The germ-band forms from the anterior of the terminal disc and extends anteriorly as the disc contracts. New segments are formed at the posterior margin of the germ-band. Once the process of segmentation ends, the germ-band folds and sinks into the yolk. We note that the classic description of centipede development, by Heymons more than a century ago, contains a fundamental error in the identification of the axes and hence in the interpretation of early segmentation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15009120     DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-142x.2004.04016.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evol Dev        ISSN: 1520-541X            Impact factor:   1.930


  23 in total

Review 1.  The evolution of arthropod heads: reconciling morphological, developmental and palaeontological evidence.

Authors:  Gerhard Scholtz; Gregory D Edgecombe
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2006-06-28       Impact factor: 0.900

2.  The expression pattern of genes involved in early neurogenesis suggests distinct and conserved functions in the diplopod Glomeris marginata.

Authors:  Hilary L Pioro; Angelika Stollewerk
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2006-05-25       Impact factor: 0.900

3.  Developing an integrated understanding of the evolution of arthropod segmentation using fossils and evo-devo.

Authors:  Ariel D Chipman; Gregory D Edgecombe
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Segment polarity gene expression in a myriapod reveals conserved and diverged aspects of early head patterning in arthropods.

Authors:  Ralf Janssen
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2012-08-18       Impact factor: 0.900

5.  A comparison of Hox3 and Zen protein coding sequences in taxa that span the Hox3/zen divergence.

Authors:  Kristen Anne Panfilio; Michael Akam
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 0.900

6.  The involvement of engrailed and wingless during segmentation in the onychophoran Euperipatoides kanangrensis (Peripatopsidae: Onychophora) (Reid 1996).

Authors:  Bo Joakim Eriksson; Noel N Tait; Graham E Budd; Michael Akam
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 0.900

7.  Michael Akam and the rise of evolutionary developmental biology.

Authors:  David L Stern; Rachel E Dawes-Hoang
Journal:  Int J Dev Biol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.203

8.  Six3 demarcates the anterior-most developing brain region in bilaterian animals.

Authors:  Patrick Rh Steinmetz; Rolf Urbach; Nico Posnien; Joakim Eriksson; Roman P Kostyuchenko; Carlo Brena; Keren Guy; Michael Akam; Gregor Bucher; Detlev Arendt
Journal:  Evodevo       Date:  2010-12-29       Impact factor: 2.250

9.  Travelling and splitting of a wave of hedgehog expression involved in spider-head segmentation.

Authors:  Masaki Kanayama; Yasuko Akiyama-Oda; Osamu Nishimura; Hiroshi Tarui; Kiyokazu Agata; Hiroki Oda
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2011-10-11       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Ancestral patterning of tergite formation in a centipede suggests derived mode of trunk segmentation in trilobites.

Authors:  Javier Ortega-Hernández; Carlo Brena
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.