Literature DB >> 15009086

Sling procedures for urinary incontinence in women.

Z G Kassardjian1.   

Abstract

There are many different techniques of sling surgery for female incontinence and numerous materials are available for use as a suburethral sling. Autologous materials are associated with more success and fewer complications than cadaveric material. The objectives of this review are to identity the benefits and adverse effects of suburethral sling procedures. There is no evidence that suburethral slings are better or worse than other surgical or conservative management because no trials have addressed this comparison.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15009086     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.2003.04691.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  3 in total

1.  The surgical results of the pubovaginal sling procedure using Intravaginal Slingplasty (IVS) for stress urinary incontinence.

Authors:  Erem Kaan Basok; Asif Yildirim; Necmettin Atsu; Cenk Gurbuz; Resit Tokuc
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Comparative results of two techniques to treat stress urinary incontinence: synthetic transobturator and aponeurotic slings.

Authors:  Marcos Tcherniakovsky; César Eduardo Fernandes; Carlos Alberto Bezerra; Carlos Antonio Del Roy; Eric Roger Wroclawski
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2009-04-18

3.  One-year outcomes of mid-urethral sling procedures for stress urinary incontinence according to body mass index.

Authors:  In Sung Hwang; Ji Hyeong Yu; Jae Yong Chung; Chung Hee Noh; Luck Hee Sung
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2012-03-19
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.