Literature DB >> 15009032

Clinical practice guidelines for the use of axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy in carcinoma of the breast: current update.

Gordon F Schwartz1.   

Abstract

Axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been adopted as a suitable alternative to traditional level I and II axillary dissection in the management of clinically node-negative (N0) breast cancers. There are two current techniques used to identify the sentinel node(s): radiopharmaceutical, technetium sulfur colloid, and isosulfan blue dye (used in the United States) and technetium-labeled albumin and patent blue dye (used in Europe). (The labeled albumin is not U.S. Food and Drug Administration [FDA] approved in the United States.) SLNB to replace axillary dissection should only be performed by surgeons and patient management teams with appropriate training and experience. Although both radiocolloid and blue dye are used together by most surgeons, and training should be in both techniques, some experienced surgeons use one or the other almost exclusively. In addition, surgical pathologists must recognize the need to examine these small specimens with great care, using a generally adopted protocol. Imprint cytology or frozen sections may be used, followed by additional sections for light microscopy. Immunochemical staining with cytokeratin or other techniques to identify "submicroscopic" metastasis is often used, but the results should not be used to influence clinical decisions with respect to adjuvant therapy. "Failed" SLNB implies the surgeon's failure to identify the sentinel nodes, in which case a complete dissection is performed. A "false-negative" SLNB implies the finding of metastasis in the excised sentinel nodes by light microscopy after a negative frozen section examination. Whether a false-negative SLNB mandates completion axillary dissection is controversial, with clinical trials currently under way to answer this question. Although SLNB was initiated to accompany breast-conserving treatment, it is equally useful in patients undergoing mastectomy. It is more difficult to perform with mastectomy. When using blue dye only, SLNB may require a separate incision because of time constraints between injection and identification of the blue-stained nodes; radiocolloid usually does not. Completion axillary dissection after false-negative SLNB is more difficult after mastectomy. SLNB is a useful procedure that may save 70% of women with clinically negative (N0) axillae and all of those with pathologically negative axillae from the morbidity of complete axillary dissection. Ideally the sentinel nodes should be able to identified in more than 95% of patients, with a false-negative rate of less than 5%. Until these rates can be achieved consistently, however, surgeons should not abandon traditional axillary dissection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15009032     DOI: 10.1111/j.1075-122x.2004.21439.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast J        ISSN: 1075-122X            Impact factor:   2.431


  13 in total

1.  The Role of Blue Dye in Sentinel Node Detection for Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Study of 203 Patients.

Authors:  Jean-Remi Garbay; Dounia Skalli-Chrisostome; Nicolas Leymarie; Benjamin Sarfati; Francoise Rimareix; Chafika Mazouni
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 2.  Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: a work in progress.

Authors:  Abhishek Chatterjee; Nicholas Serniak; Brian J Czerniecki
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2015 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.360

3.  Breast cancer larger than 2.5 cm with tumor-free radioisotope-hot sentinel nodes has higher risk of non-hot axillary lymph node metastasis.

Authors:  Yu-Ling Liu; Wen-Ling Kuo; Yong-Feng Lo; Hsiu-Pei Tsai; Shih-Che Shen; Chi-Chang Yu; Hsu-Huan Chou; Chia-Huei Chu; Shin-Cheh Chen
Journal:  Biomed J       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: predictors of axillary and non-sentinel lymph node involvement.

Authors:  Hakan Postacı; Baha Zengel; Ulkem Yararbaş; Adam Uslu; Nuket Eliyatkın; Göksever Akpınar; Fevzi Cengiz; Raika Durusoy
Journal:  Balkan Med J       Date:  2013-12-01       Impact factor: 2.021

5.  Diagnostic value of full-dose FDG PET/CT for axillary lymph node staging in breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Till A Heusner; Sherko Kuemmel; Steffen Hahn; Angela Koeninger; Friedrich Otterbach; Monia E Hamami; Klaus R Kimmig; Michael Forsting; Andreas Bockisch; Gerald Antoch; Alexander Stahl
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-05-05       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Surgical sentinel lymph node biopsy in early breast cancer. Could it be avoided by performing a preoperative staging procedure? A pilot study.

Authors:  Alberto Testori; Stefano Meroni; Oana Codrina Moscovici; Paola Magnoni; Paolo Malerba; Arturo Chiti; Daoud Rahal; Roberto Travaglini; Umberto Cariboni; Marco Alloisio; Sergio Orefice
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2012-09

Review 7.  Contraindications of sentinel lymph node biopsy: are there any really?

Authors:  George M Filippakis; George Zografos
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-01-29       Impact factor: 2.754

8.  Current management of the axilla in patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer: a nationwide survey of United Kingdom breast surgeons.

Authors:  Lucy Mansfield; Isi Sosa; Roberta Dionello; Ash Subramanian; Haresh Devalia; Kefah Mokbel
Journal:  Int Semin Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-02-14

9.  Three stage axillary lymphatic massage optimizes sentinel lymph node localisation using blue dye.

Authors:  Robert M Kirby; Abdul Basit; Quang T Nguyen; Anthony Jaipersad; Rebecca Billingham
Journal:  Int Semin Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-12-22

Review 10.  The sentinel node in gynaecological malignancies.

Authors:  J Balega; P O Van Trappen
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.