Literature DB >> 15008931

rhBMP-2 significantly enhances guided bone regeneration.

Ulf M E Wikesjö1, Mohammed Qahash, Robert C Thomson, Alonzo D Cook, Michael D Rohrer, John M Wozney, W Ross Hardwick.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown a limited potential for bone augmentation following guided bone regeneration (GBR) in horizontal alveolar defects. Surgical implantation of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) in an absorbable collagen sponge carrier (ACS) significantly enhances bone regeneration in such defects; however, sufficient quantities of bone for implant dentistry are not routinely obtained. The objective of this study was to evaluate the potential of rhBMP-2/ACS to enhance GBR using a space-providing, macro-porous expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) device.
METHODS: Bilateral, critical size, supra-alveolar, peri-implant defects were surgically created in four Hound Labrador mongrel dogs. Two turned and one surface-etched 10-mm titanium dental implant were placed 5 mm into the surgically reduced alveolar ridge creating 5-mm supra-alveolar defects. rhBMP-2/ACS (rhBMP-2 at 0.2 mg/ml) or buffer/ACS was randomly assigned to left and right jaw quadrants in subsequent animals. The space-providing, macro-porous ePTFE device was placed to cover rhBMP-2/ACS and control constructs and dental implants. Gingival flaps were advanced for primary wound closure. The animals were euthanized at 8 weeks postsurgery for histologic and histometric analysis.
RESULTS: Bone formation was significantly enhanced in defects receiving rhBMP-2/ACS compared to control. Vertical bone gain averaged (+/- SD) 4.7 +/- 0.3 and 4.8 +/- 0.1 mm, and new bone area 10.3 +/- 2.0 and 8.0 +/- 2.5 mm2 at turned and surface-etched dental implants, respectively. Corresponding values for the control were 1.8 +/- 2.0 and 1.3 +/- 1.3 mm, and 1.8 +/- 1.3 and 1.2 +/- 0.6 mm2. Bone-implant contact in rhBMP-2-induced bone averaged 6.4 +/- 1.4% and 9.6 +/- 7.5% for turned and surface-etched dental implants, respectively (P=0.399). Corresponding values for the control were 14.6 +/- 19.4% and 23.7 +/- 9.7% (P=0.473). Bone-implant contact in resident bone ranged between 43% and 58% without significant differences between dental implant surfaces.
CONCLUSIONS: rhBMP-2/ACS significantly enhances GBR at turned and surface-etched dental implants. The dental implant surface technology does not appear to substantially influence bone formation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15008931     DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.00971.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res        ISSN: 0905-7161            Impact factor:   5.977


  20 in total

1.  Bone grafts in craniofacial surgery.

Authors:  Mohammed E Elsalanty; David G Genecov
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2009-10

Review 2.  Growth factor delivery for oral and periodontal tissue engineering.

Authors:  Darnell Kaigler; Joni A Cirelli; William V Giannobile
Journal:  Expert Opin Drug Deliv       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 6.648

Review 3.  Gene therapeutics for periodontal regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Christoph A Ramseier; Zachary R Abramson; Qiming Jin; William V Giannobile
Journal:  Dent Clin North Am       Date:  2006-04

Review 4.  Organic-inorganic surface modifications for titanium implant surfaces.

Authors:  Lise T de Jonge; Sander C G Leeuwenburgh; Joop G C Wolke; John A Jansen
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2008-05-29       Impact factor: 4.200

5.  In ovariectomy-induced osteoporotic rat models, BMP-2 substantially reversed an impaired alveolar bone regeneration whereas PDGF-BB failed.

Authors:  Hyun Ju Kim; Kyoung-Hwa Kim; Yong-Moo Lee; Young Ku; In-Chul Rhyu; Yang-Jo Seol
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 6.  Alveolar ridge preservation. A systematic review.

Authors:  Attila Horváth; Nikos Mardas; Luis André Mezzomo; Ian G Needleman; Nikos Donos
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Quantifying Vascular Changes Surrounding Bone Regeneration in a Porcine Mandibular Defect Using Computed Tomography.

Authors:  Patricia Carlisle; Jeffrey Marrs; Laura Gaviria; David T Silliman; John F Decker; Pamela Brown Baer; Teja Guda
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.056

Review 8.  Advanced reconstructive technologies for periodontal tissue repair.

Authors:  Christoph A Ramseier; Giulio Rasperini; Salvatore Batia; William V Giannobile
Journal:  Periodontol 2000       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 7.589

Review 9.  Tissue engineering for bone regeneration and osseointegration in the oral cavity.

Authors:  Sophia P Pilipchuk; Alexandra B Plonka; Alberto Monje; Andrei D Taut; Alejandro Lanis; Benjamin Kang; William V Giannobile
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 5.304

10.  Cellular Response of Anodized Titanium Surface by Poly(Lactide-co-Glycolide)/Bone Morphogenic Protein-2.

Authors:  Su-Young Lee; Jai-Young Koak; Seong-Kyun Kim; Seong-Joo Heo
Journal:  Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 4.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.