Literature DB >> 1500878

Selective attention and visual search: revision of an allocation model and application to age differences.

D J Madden1.   

Abstract

The present experiments examined a revised version of the Eriksen and Yeh model of attentional allocation during visual search. The results confirmed the assumption of the model that performance represents a weighted combination of focused- and distributed-attention trials, although Ss relied on focused attention more than was predicted. Consistent with the model, predictions on the basis of the assumption of a terminating search fit the data better than predictions on the basis of an exhaustive search. The effects of varying cue validity favored an interpretation of focused attention in terms of a processing gradient rather than a zoom lens. Although the allocation of attention across trials was similar for young and older adults, there was an age-related increase in the time required to allocate attention within individual trials.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1500878     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.18.3.821

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  14 in total

1.  Aging and attentional guidance during visual search: functional neuroanatomy by positron emission tomography.

Authors:  David J Madden; Timothy G Turkington; James M Provenzale; Laura L Denny; Linda K Langley; Thomas C Hawk; R Edward Coleman
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2002-03

2.  Age-related changes in selective attention and perceptual load during visual search.

Authors:  David J Madden; Linda K Langley
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2003-03

3.  Covert orienting: a compound-cue account of the proportion cued effect.

Authors:  Evan F Risko; Chris Blais; Jennifer A Stolz; Derek Besner
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-02

4.  On the time course of attentional focusing in older adults.

Authors:  Lisa N Jefferies; Alexa B Roggeveen; James T Enns; Patrick J Bennett; Allison B Sekuler; Vincent Di Lollo
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-12-15

5.  Properties of attentional selection during the preparation of sequential saccades.

Authors:  Daniel Baldauf; Heiner Deubel
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-09-11       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Top-down control is not lost in the attentional blink: evidence from intact endogenous cueing.

Authors:  Dexuan Zhang; Liping Shao; Mark Nieuwenstein; Xiaolin Zhou
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Endogenous visuospatial precuing effects as a function of age and task demands.

Authors:  D J Tellinghuisen; L D Zimba; D A Robin
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1996-08

8.  Visual Acuity does not Moderate Effect Sizes of Higher-Level Cognitive Tasks.

Authors:  James R Houston; Ilana J Bennett; Philip A Allen; David J Madden
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.645

9.  The spatial distribution of attention following an exogenous cue.

Authors:  J M Henderson; A D Macquistan
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-02

10.  Flexible or leaky attention in creative people? Distinct patterns of attention for different types of creative thinking.

Authors:  Darya Zabelina; Arielle Saporta; Mark Beeman
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.