Literature DB >> 15008452

Accuracy of clinical and radiological classification of the jawbone anatomy for implantation--a survey of 374 patients.

Gintaras Juodzbalys1, Aune M Raustia.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the anatomical features of edentulous jaw dental segments (eJDS) in order to offer the most reliable clinical and radiological classification of such segments in planning for implant treatment. A total of 374 patients, 156 men and 218 women, participated in the investigation. The mean age of the patients was 46 years (SD 12.7), ranging between 17 and 73 years. The eJDS were estimated by means of orthopantomogram, computerized tomography, and intraorally with special ridge-mapping callipers for measurement of alveolar process width. A total of 792 screw-shaped and 1-stage Osteofix Dental Implant System (Oulu, Finland) implants were inserted. Dental segments were divided according to the results of the commonly accepted eJDS assessments into 3 clinical-anatomical types. Type I indicated insignificant or no atrophy of eJDS (232 patients with 476 implant sites; 60.1% of the total number). Type II indicated mild to moderate vertical or horizontal atrophy of eJDS (100 patients with 222 sites; 28% of the total number). Type III indicated significant vertical or horizontal atrophy of eJDS (42 patients with 94 sites; 11.9% of the total number). The accuracy of the clinical and radiological classification was adjudged to have been 95.8%. By the process of establishing clinical and radiological classification of the jawbone segments, more reliability was anticipated regarding the insertion of implants both in maxillae and mandibles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15008452     DOI: 10.1563/1548-1336(2004)030<0030:AOCARC>2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Implantol        ISSN: 0160-6972            Impact factor:   1.779


  7 in total

1.  Descriptive study of mandibular canal visibility: morphometric and densitometric analysis for digital panoramic radiographs.

Authors:  Marius Kubilius; Ričardas Kubilius; Vaidas Varinauskas; Rimantas Žalinkevičius; Tolga F Tözüm; Gintaras Juodžbalys
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  Guided bone regeneration simultaneous with implant placement using bovine-derived xenograft with and without liquid platelet-rich fibrin: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Gözde Işık; Meltem Özden Yüce; Nazan Koçak-Topbaş; Tayfun Günbay
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  The Comprehensive AOCMF Classification System: Midface Fractures - Level 3 Tutorial.

Authors:  Carl-Peter Cornelius; Laurent Audigé; Christoph Kunz; Carlos H Buitrago-Téllez; Randal Rudderman; Joachim Prein
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2014-12

Review 4.  Tentpole technique for bone regeneration in vertically deficient alveolar ridges: A review.

Authors:  Dipti Daga; Divya Mehrotra; Shadab Mohammad; Geeta Singh; S M Natu
Journal:  J Oral Biol Craniofac Res       Date:  2015-04-03

5.  Evaluation of complication rates and vertical bone gain after guided bone regeneration with non-resorbable membranes versus titanium meshes and resorbable membranes. A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Alessandro Cucchi; Elisabetta Vignudelli; Aldo Napolitano; Claudio Marchetti; Giuseppe Corinaldesi
Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 3.932

6.  Identification of the mandibular vital structures: practical clinical applications of anatomy and radiological examination methods.

Authors:  Gintaras Juodzbalys; Hom-Lay Wang
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2010-07-01

Review 7.  Clinical and radiological classification of the jawbone anatomy in endosseous dental implant treatment.

Authors:  Gintaras Juodzbalys; Marius Kubilius
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Res       Date:  2013-07-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.