Literature DB >> 15008316

Acute chest pain--identification of patients at low risk for coronary events. The impact of symptoms, medical history and risk factors.

Martin Schillinger1, Gottfried Sodeck, Giora Meron, Karin Janata, Mariam Nikfardjam, Fritz Rauscha, Anton N Laggner, Hans Domanovits.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The evaluation of patients with acute chest pain remains challenging, as it implies the risk of fatal misdiagnosis. It is well recognized that typical angina does not specifically identify patients at high risk. We investigated the predictive value of characteristics atypical for myocardial ischemia for exclusion of acute or subacute coronary events, focusing on patients' symptoms, medical history and risk factors.
METHODS: We prospectively studied 1288 consecutive patients presenting with acute chest pain at a non-trauma emergency department. Patients' symptoms, history and risk factors were evaluated using seven predefined criteria and assigned as typical or atypical for ischemic coronary chest pain. Positive predictive value (PPV) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated to predict or exclude acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and major adverse cardiac events (MACE: cardiovascular death, percutaneous coronary interventions, bypass surgery, or myocardial infarction) within six months.
RESULTS: AMI occurred in 168 patients (13%), and 6-months MACE (including AMI) overall in 240 patients (19%). Presence of four or more criteria typical for myocardial ischemia was associated with a PPV of 0.21 (0.17 to 0.25) for predicting AMI and 0.30 (0.25 to 0.35) for 6-months MACE. Presence of four or more criteria atypical for coronary ischemia was associated with a PPV of 0.94 (0.91 to 0.96) for excluding AMI and 0.93 (0.90 to 0.96) for excluding 6-months MACE. In 165 of 476 patients under 40 years of age (35%), four or more atypical criteria excluded AMI and 6-months MACE with PPVs of 0.98 (0.96 to 1.0).
CONCLUSION: Evaluation of criteria atypical for myocardial ischemia with acute chest pain may help to identify candidates for early discharge, whereas typical characteristics have very little diagnostic value.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15008316     DOI: 10.1007/bf03040701

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr        ISSN: 0043-5325            Impact factor:   1.704


  27 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation of the patient with acute chest pain.

Authors:  T H Lee; L Goldman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-04-20       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  A clinical trial of a chest-pain observation unit for patients with unstable angina. Chest Pain Evaluation in the Emergency Room (CHEER) Investigators.

Authors:  M E Farkouh; P A Smars; G S Reeder; A R Zinsmeister; R W Evans; T D Meloy; S L Kopecky; M Allen; T G Allison; R J Gibbons; S E Gabriel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1998-12-24       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Missed diagnoses of acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department.

Authors:  J H Pope; T P Aufderheide; R Ruthazer; R H Woolard; J A Feldman; J R Beshansky; J L Griffith; H P Selker
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-04-20       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Ruling out acute myocardial infarction early with two serial creatine kinase-MBmass determinations.

Authors:  R J de Winter; R Bholasingh; A B Nieuwenhuijs; R W Koster; R J Peters; G T Sanders
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 29.983

5.  An emergency department-based protocol for rapidly ruling out myocardial ischemia reduces hospital time and expense: results of a randomized study (ROMIO).

Authors:  M A Gomez; J L Anderson; L A Karagounis; J B Muhlestein; F B Mooers
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 24.094

6.  Typical symptoms are predictive of acute coronary syndromes in women.

Authors:  Kerry A Milner; Marjorie Funk; Amy Arnold; Viola Vaccarino
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 4.749

7.  A rapid diagnostic and treatment center for patients with chest pain in the emergency department.

Authors:  W B Gibler; J P Runyon; R C Levy; M R Sayre; R Kacich; C R Hattemer; C Hamilton; J W Gerlach; R A Walsh
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 5.721

8.  Is telemetry monitoring necessary in low-risk suspected acute chest pain syndromes?

Authors:  Adam Snider; Marco Papaleo; Stuart Beldner; Chong Park; Dennis Katechis; David Galinkin; Alan Fein
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 9.410

9.  Disposition of presumed coronary patients from an emergency room. A follow-up study.

Authors:  S Schor; S Behar; B Modan; V Barell; J Drory; I Kariv
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1976-08-23       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Clinical signs of pulmonary congestion predict outcome in patients with acute chest pain.

Authors:  Martin Schillinger; Hans Domanovits; Monika Paulis; Mariam Nikfardjam; Giora Meron; Istepan Kurkciyan; Anton N Laggner
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2002-11-30       Impact factor: 1.704

View more
  3 in total

1.  Position dependent right ventricular dysfunction caused by a giant right coronary artery aneurysm.

Authors:  Bruno Mora; Bernhard Urbanek; Christian Loewe; Michael Grimm; Martin Dworschak
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 1.704

2.  Clinical value of chest pain presentation and prodromes on the assessment of cardiovascular disease: a cohort study.

Authors:  John Robson; Luis Ayerbe; Rohini Mathur; Juliet Addo; Andrew Wragg
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 3.  Pitfalls in Electrocardiographic Diagnosis of Acute Coronary Syndrome in Low-Risk Chest Pain.

Authors:  Semhar Z Tewelde; Amal Mattu; William J Brady
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2017-04-17
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.