Kathryn A Robb1, Anne Miles, Jane Wardle. 1. Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to investigate demographic and psychosocial predictors of perceptions of risk for colorectal cancer (CRC) in a population-based sample. METHODS: The study was a cross-sectional survey of 18,447 men and women aged 55-64 years. A mailed questionnaire assessed perceived comparative risk for CRC along with demographic characteristics (age, gender, ethnicity, marital status, and socioeconomic status), health-related factors (family history, subjective health and bowel symptoms, and health behaviors), and emotional state (anxiety). RESULTS: Being male and older were associated with lower perceived risk. Having a family history of CRC, poorer subjective health, more symptoms, and higher levels of anxiety were all associated with increased perceived risk of CRC. Smokers and nonexercisers perceived their risk as higher. CONCLUSIONS: Misperceptions surrounding the effects of age and gender on CRC risk, as well as the genetic link and pathogenesis of CRC, need to be addressed in risk communications.
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to investigate demographic and psychosocial predictors of perceptions of risk for colorectal cancer (CRC) in a population-based sample. METHODS: The study was a cross-sectional survey of 18,447 men and women aged 55-64 years. A mailed questionnaire assessed perceived comparative risk for CRC along with demographic characteristics (age, gender, ethnicity, marital status, and socioeconomic status), health-related factors (family history, subjective health and bowel symptoms, and health behaviors), and emotional state (anxiety). RESULTS: Being male and older were associated with lower perceived risk. Having a family history of CRC, poorer subjective health, more symptoms, and higher levels of anxiety were all associated with increased perceived risk of CRC. Smokers and nonexercisers perceived their risk as higher. CONCLUSIONS: Misperceptions surrounding the effects of age and gender on CRC risk, as well as the genetic link and pathogenesis of CRC, need to be addressed in risk communications.
Authors: Adana A Llanos; Michael L Pennell; Gregory S Young; Cathy M Tatum; Mira L Katz; Electra D Paskett Journal: J Public Health (Oxf) Date: 2014-05-20 Impact factor: 2.341
Authors: Erin Turbitt; Megan C Roberts; Jennifer M Taber; Erika A Waters; Timothy S McNeel; Barbara B Biesecker; William M P Klein Journal: Prev Med Date: 2019-02-25 Impact factor: 4.018
Authors: Catharine Wang; Suzanne M O'Neill; Nan Rothrock; Robert Gramling; Ananda Sen; Louise S Acheson; Wendy S Rubinstein; Donald E Nease; Mack T Ruffin Journal: Prev Med Date: 2008-11-25 Impact factor: 4.018