Literature DB >> 15006106

The performance of blood pressure and other cardiovascular risk factors as screening tests for ischaemic heart disease and stroke.

M R Law1, N J Wald, J K Morris.   

Abstract

This paper summarises the main evidence and conclusions relating to using blood pressure measurement as a screening test to identify people who will develop ischaemic heart disease (IHD) or stroke, as recently published in a Health Technology Assessment report. While blood pressure is recognised as an important cause of stroke and IHD, and lowering blood pressure can substantially lower the risk of these diseases, the measurement of blood pressure is a poor screening test. It is not good in distinguishing those who will and will not develop these diseases. The poor screening performance is illustrated by the findings that in the largest cohort study, persons in the top 10% of the distribution of systolic blood pressure experienced only 21% of all IHD events and 28% of all strokes at a given age. Using several cardiovascular risk factors in combination does not add materially to the poor screening performance of blood pressure alone. Among persons in a specified age group, the 5% at highest risk experience 17% of all heart disease deaths with risk computation based on blood pressure alone, 22% when based on blood pressure and apolipoprotein B (or LDL cholesterol) in combination, and only 28% using these two, smoking and three other cardiovascular risk factors all in combination. Identifying patients at the time of hospital discharge following myocardial infarction or stroke is the most effective screening test to identify those who will die of cardiovascular disease. In patients with a history of myocardial infarction or stroke the cardiovascular death rate in the absence of treatment is about 5% per year, a risk that persists for at least 15 years. In the absence of treatment, about half of all deaths from heart disease in a population occur after hospital discharge following the first infarct. Among persons with no history of cardiovascular disease, age is a better screening test than the reversible risk factors, and the best policy is to offer treatment to all persons above a specified age such as 55 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15006106     DOI: 10.1177/096914130301100102

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Screen        ISSN: 0969-1413            Impact factor:   2.136


  14 in total

1.  Cardiovascular risk scores in the prediction of subclinical atherosclerosis in young adults: evidence from the cardiovascular risk in a young Finns study.

Authors:  Juho R H Raiko; Costan G Magnussen; Mika Kivimäki; Leena Taittonen; Tomi Laitinen; Mika Kähönen; Nina Hutri-Kähönen; Antti Jula; Britt-Marie Loo; Russell J Thomson; Terho Lehtimäki; Jorma S A Viikari; Olli T Raitakari; Markus Juonala
Journal:  Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil       Date:  2010-10

2.  The time has come for clinical cardiovascular trials with plaque characterization as an endpoint.

Authors:  Zahi A Fayad; Venkatesh Mani; Valentin Fuster
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2011-08-28       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 3.  CVD screening in low-risk, asymptomatic adults: clinical trials needed.

Authors:  Tamar S Polonsky; Philip Greenland
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 32.419

4.  The causal exposure model of vascular disease.

Authors:  Allan D Sniderman; Patrick R Lawler; Ken Williams; George Thanassoulis; Jacqueline de Graaf; Curt D Furberg
Journal:  Clin Sci (Lond)       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 6.124

5.  Acceptance of a Polypill approach to prevent cardiovascular disease among a sample of U.S. physicians.

Authors:  Anthony J Viera; Stacey L Sheridan; Teresa Edwards; Elsayed Z Soliman; Russell Harris; Curt D Furberg
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 6.  Multicenter epidemiological studies of atherosclerosis imaging.

Authors:  Songtao Liu; David A Bluemke
Journal:  Top Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2009-08

Review 7.  Evaluating the quality of research into a single prognostic biomarker: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 83 studies of C-reactive protein in stable coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Harry Hemingway; Peter Philipson; Ruoling Chen; Natalie K Fitzpatrick; Jacqueline Damant; Martin Shipley; Keith R Abrams; Santiago Moreno; Kate S L McAllister; Stephen Palmer; Juan Carlos Kaski; Adam D Timmis; Aroon D Hingorani
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2010-06-01       Impact factor: 11.069

Review 8.  Utility of genetic determinants of lipids and cardiovascular events in assessing risk.

Authors:  Michael V Holmes; Seamus Harrison; Philippa J Talmud; Aroon D Hingorani; Steve E Humphries
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 32.419

Review 9.  Critical appraisal of CRP measurement for the prediction of coronary heart disease events: new data and systematic review of 31 prospective cohorts.

Authors:  Tina Shah; Juan P Casas; Jackie A Cooper; Ioanna Tzoulaki; Reecha Sofat; Valerie McCormack; Liam Smeeth; John E Deanfield; Gordon D Lowe; Ann Rumley; F Gerald R Fowkes; Steve E Humphries; Aroon D Hingorani
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-10-17       Impact factor: 7.196

10.  Is the high-risk strategy to prevent cardiovascular disease equitable? A pharmacoepidemiological cohort study.

Authors:  Helle Wallach-Kildemoes; Finn Diderichsen; Allan Krasnik; Theis Lange; Morten Andersen
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-08-04       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.