Literature DB >> 1500609

Reports of real and false memories: the relevance of hypnosis, hypnotizability, and context of memory test.

A J Barnier1, K M McConkey.   

Abstract

Thirty high- and 30 low-hypnotizable subjects saw slides of a purse snatching and then imagined seeing the slides in hypnosis or waking conditions. The experimenter suggested the offender had a moustache (true), wore a scarf (false), and picked up flowers (false). Memory was tested by the experimenter after the suggestion, by another experimenter during an inquiry session, and again by the 2nd experimenter after the experimenter appeared to end the session. Hypnotizability, but not hypnosis, was associated with false memory reports; more high-than low-hypnotizable subjects reported false memories. The context of testing influenced true and false memory reports; fewer reports occurred in an informal rather than a formal test context.

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1500609     DOI: 10.1037//0021-843x.101.3.521

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol        ISSN: 0021-843X


  4 in total

1.  Individual differences in imagination inflation.

Authors:  C Heaps; M Nash
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1999-06

2.  Memory on the beach: an Australian memory (and hypnosis) laboratory.

Authors:  Amanda J Barnier; Richard A Bryant; Leah Campbell; Rochelle Cox; Celia Harris; Lynette Hung; Fiona Maccallum; Stefanie J Sharman
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2005-08-26

Review 3.  The repressed memory controversy: is there middle ground?

Authors:  P S Penfold
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-09-15       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Susceptibility to long-term misinformation effect outside of the laboratory.

Authors:  Miriam J J Lommen; Iris M Engelhard; Marcel A van den Hout
Journal:  Eur J Psychotraumatol       Date:  2013-05-02
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.