Literature DB >> 15005924

Patients awaiting laparoscopic cholecystectomy--can preoperative complications be predicted?

D J A Thornton1, A Robertson, D J Alexander.   

Abstract

AIMS: To determine the nature and incidence of gallstone-related complications arising in patients awaiting laparoscopic cholecystectomy and to formulate a strategy to detect those most in need of urgent intervention. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the case notes of 337 consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy under a single surgeon in a district general hospital between 1995 and 1999.
RESULTS: Of patients awaiting laparoscopic cholecystectomy, 65 (19.3%) were documented as suffering significant on-going symptoms, of whom 19 (5.6%) required hospital admission or urgent surgical review at median 8.9 weeks (range 0.1-32.3 weeks) after being placed on the waiting list. Factors predictive of symptom recurrence included: (i) initial acute presentation; (ii) diagnoses of jaundice, pancreatitis, or acute cholecystitis; (iii) elevation of amylase or liver function tests; and (iv) small stones on ultrasonography examination.
CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of patients awaiting laparoscopic cholecystectomy experience stone-related complications requiring hospital admission. We feel it is possible to reduce this number by selecting those most at risk on the basis of their history and pre-operative investigations for more urgent intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15005924      PMCID: PMC1964150          DOI: 10.1308/003588404322827446

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  8 in total

1.  Systematic review of cholecystostomy as a treatment option in acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  Anders Winbladh; Per Gullstrand; Joar Svanvik; Per Sandström
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.647

2.  Low ninety-day re-admission rates after emergency and elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a district general hospital.

Authors:  Sue K Down; Marko Nicolic; Hibba Abdulkarim; Nick Skelton; Adrian H Harris; Yashwant Koak
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Routine surveillance cholangiography after percutaneous cholecystostomy delays drain removal and cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Tyler J Loftus; Scott C Brakenridge; Frederick A Moore; Camille G Dessaigne; George A Sarosi; William J Zingarelli; Janeen R Jordan; Chasen A Croft; R Stephen Smith; Philip A Efron; Alicia M Mohr
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.313

4.  Recurrence of biliary disease following non-operative management in elderly patients.

Authors:  Simon Bergman; Mohammed Al-Bader; Nadia Sourial; Isabelle Vedel; Wael C Hanna; Aaron J Bilek; Christos Galatas; Jonah E Marek; Shannon A Fraser
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Urgent cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis in a district general hospital - is it feasible?

Authors:  M N Khan; I Nordon; A S K Ghauri; C Ranaboldo; N Carty
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  The cost of ignoring acute cholecystectomy.

Authors:  J P Garner; S K Sood; J Robinson; W Barber; K Ravi
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  The management of acute cholecystitis in chronic hemodialysis patients: percutaneous cholecystostomy versus cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Yusuf Gunay; Huseyin Yuce Bircan; Ertan Emek; Halime Cevik; Gulum Altaca; Gokhan Moray
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Predictive factors for gangrene complication in acute calculous cholecystitis.

Authors:  Bader Hamza Shirah; Hamza Asaad Shirah; Muhammad Adnan Saleem; Mohammad Azam Chughtai; Mohamed Ali Elraghi; Mohamed Elsayed Shams
Journal:  Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg       Date:  2019-08-30
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.