Literature DB >> 15005679

Simultaneous continuous recording of accommodation and pupil size using the modified Shin-Nippon SRW-5000 autorefractor.

J S Wolffsohn1, C O'Donnell, W N Charman, B Gilmartin.   

Abstract

The internal optics of the recent models of the Shin-Nippon SRW-5000 autorefractor (also marketed as the Grand Seiko WV-500) have been modified by the manufacturer so that the infrared measurement ring has been replaced by pairs of horizontal and vertical infrared bars, on either side of fixation. The binocular, open field-of-view, allowing the accommodative state to be objectively monitored while a natural environment is viewed, has made the SRW-5000 a valuable tool in further understanding the nature of the oculomotor response. It is shown that the root-mean-square of model eye measures was least (0.017 +/- 0.002 D) when the separation of the horizontal measurement bars were averaged twice. The separation of the horizontal bars changes by 3.59 pixels/dioptre (r2 = 0.99), allowing continuous on-line analysis of the refractive state at up to 60 Hz temporal resolution to an accuracy of <0.001 D, with pupils >3 mm. The pupil edge is not obscured in the diagonal axis by the measurement bars, unlike the ring of the original optics, so in the newer model pupil size can be measured simultaneously at the same rate with a resolution of <0.001 mm. The measurements of accommodation and pupil size are relatively unaffected by eccentricity of viewing up to +/-10 degrees from the visual axis and instrument focusing inaccuracies over a range of 10 mm towards the eye and 5 mm away from the eye. The resolution and temporal properties of the analysis are therefore ideal for the simultaneous measurement of dynamic accommodation and pupil responses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15005679     DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2004.00186.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0275-5408            Impact factor:   3.117


  9 in total

Review 1.  Restoration of accommodation: surgical options for correction of presbyopia.

Authors:  Adrian Glasser
Journal:  Clin Exp Optom       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.742

2.  Creating correct blur and its effect on accommodation.

Authors:  Steven A Cholewiak; Gordon D Love; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Static and dynamic accommodation measured using the WAM-5500 Autorefractor.

Authors:  Dorothy M Win-Hall; Jamie Houser; Adrian Glasser
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  Measuring near-induced transient myopia in college students with visual discomfort.

Authors:  Eric Borsting; Chinatsu Tosha; Chris Chase; William H Ridder
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  Cognitive Demand and Accommodative Microfluctuations.

Authors:  Niall J Hynes; Matthew P Cufflin; Karen M Hampson; Edward A H Mallen
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2018-09-06

6.  Lags and leads of accommodation in humans: Fact or fiction?

Authors:  Vivek Labhishetty; Steven A Cholewiak; Austin Roorda; Martin S Banks
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Is Ocular Accommodation Influenced by Dynamic Ambient Illumination and Pupil Size?

Authors:  Hanyang Yu; Wentao Li; Ziping Chen; Mengzhen Chen; Junwen Zeng; Xijiang Lin; Feng Zhao
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 4.614

8.  Ocular accommodation and cognitive demand: an additional indicator besides pupil size and cardiovascular measures?

Authors:  Stephanie Jainta; Joerg Hoormann; Wolfgang Jaschinski
Journal:  J Negat Results Biomed       Date:  2008-08-23

9.  The effect of image resolution of display types on accommodative microfluctuations.

Authors:  Niall J Hynes; Matthew P Cufflin; Karen M Hampson; Edward Ah Mallen
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 3.992

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.