Literature DB >> 15005649

Estimation of nonlinear psychophysical kernels.

Peter Neri1.   

Abstract

Reverse correlation techniques have been extensively used in physiology (Marmarelis & Marmarelis 1978; Sakai, Naka, & Korenberg, 1988), allowing characterization of both linear and nonlinear aspects of neuronal processing (e.g., Emerson, Bergen, & Adelson, 1992; Emerson & Citron 1992). Over the past decades, Ahumada (1996) developed a psychophysical reverse correlation technique, termed noise image classification (NIC), for deriving the linear properties of sensory filters in the context of audition first (Ahumada, 1967; Ahumada, Marken, & Sandusky, 1975), and then vision (Ahumada, 1996, 2002; Beard & Ahumada, 1998). This work explores ways of characterizing nonlinear aspects of psychophysical filters. One approach consists of an extension of the NIC technique (ExtNIC), whereby second-order (rather than just first-order) statistics in the classified noise are used to derive sensory kernels. It is shown that under some conditions, this procedure yields a good estimate of second-order kernels. A second, different approach is also considered. This method uses functional minimization (fMin) to generate kernels that best simulate psychophysical responses for a given set of stimuli. Advantages and disadvantages of the two approaches are discussed. A mathematical appendix shows some interesting facts: (1) that nonlinearities affect the linear estimate (particularly target-present averages) obtained from the NIC method, providing a rationale for some related observations made by Ahumada (1967); (2) that for a linear filter followed by a static nonlinearity (LN system), the ExtNIC estimate of the second-order nonlinear kernel is correctly null, provided the criterion is unbiased; (3) that for a biased criterion, such an estimate may contain predictable modulations related to the linear filter; and (4) that under certain assumptions and conditions, ExtNIC does return a correct estimate for the second-order nonlinear kernel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15005649     DOI: 10.1167/4.2.2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  13 in total

1.  The empirical characteristics of human pattern vision defy theoretically-driven expectations.

Authors:  Peter Neri
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 4.475

2.  Psychophysical reverse correlation with multiple response alternatives.

Authors:  Huanping Dai; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 3.  Analyzing receptive fields, classification images and functional images: challenges with opportunities for synergy.

Authors:  Jonathan D Victor
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Classification images with uncertainty.

Authors:  Bosco S Tjan; Anirvan S Nandy
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2006-04-04       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Integration of direction cues is invariant to the temporal gap between them.

Authors:  Roozbeh Kiani; Anne K Churchland; Michael N Shadlen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Theoretical analysis of reverse-time correlation for idealized orientation tuning dynamics.

Authors:  Gregor Kovacic; Louis Tao; David Cai; Michael J Shelley
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 1.621

7.  Representation of accumulating evidence for a decision in two parietal areas.

Authors:  Victor de Lafuente; Mehrdad Jazayeri; Michael N Shadlen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Internal representations for face detection: an application of noise-based image classification to BOLD responses.

Authors:  Adrian Nestor; Jean M Vettel; Michael J Tarr
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Estimating classification images with generalized linear and additive models.

Authors:  Kenneth Knoblauch; Laurence T Maloney
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-12-22       Impact factor: 2.240

10.  How inherently noisy is human sensory processing?

Authors:  Peter Neri
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2010-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.