Literature DB >> 15004864

An evaluation of patient satisfaction in Turkey with the EUROPEP instrument.

Nezih Dağdeviren1, Zekeriya Akturk.   

Abstract

Seeking to understand patient perspectives is an important step in the efforts to improve the quality of health care. Developed by the EQuiP Task Force on Patient Evaluations of General Practice Care, the EUROPEP instrument aims to collect information on patient evaluations of general practice care. In order to expose the current state of patient satisfaction and make international comparisons, a study was conducted with relevant data collected from Turkey. The Turkish version of the EUROPEP instrument was administered to 1160 patients in six different Turkish cities. Thirty-three medical practices were included in the study. In every practice, a minimum of 30 adult patients who visited the practice for a consultation were consecutively included. The results were compared with previous values from European countries. "Helping you understand the importance of following his or her advice", "Getting through to the practice on the telephone", and "Providing quick services for urgent health problems" were evaluated best (76.7%, 76.3%, and 76.2%, 'good or excellent' ratings, respectively) and "Helping to deal with emotional problems related to the health status" was rated the worst (60.2%, 'good or excellent'). Other areas which had low ratings were: "Waiting time in the waiting room" (63.0%), "Quick relief of symptoms" (61.3%), and "Involving patients in decisions about medical care" (61.3%). Patient evaluations can help to educate medical staff about their achievements as well as their failures, assisting them to be more responsive to their patients' needs. In order to get the best benefit from EUROPEP, national benchmarking should be started to enable national and international comparisons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15004864     DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2004.45.1.23

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Yonsei Med J        ISSN: 0513-5796            Impact factor:   2.759


  7 in total

1.  Predictors of Patient Satisfaction with Nursing Care in an Orthopedic and Urologic Population.

Authors:  Hamidreza Sadeghi-Gandomani; Negin Masoudi Alavi; Mohammad Afshar
Journal:  Galen Med J       Date:  2018-12-31

2.  An evaluation of patients' opinions of primary care physicians: the use of EUROPEP in Gaza Strip-Palestine.

Authors:  Tayser Abu Mourad; Suzanne Shashaa; Adelais Markaki; Athanasios Alegakis; Christos Lionis; Anastas Philalithis
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.460

3.  [Evaluation of the satisfaction of hospitalized patients in a gynecology obstetric department in Sousse, Tunisia].

Authors:  Iheb Bougmiza; Meriem E L Ghardallou; Chekib Zedini; Hatem Lahouimel; Thouraya Nabli-Ajmi; Ridha Gataa; Imen Touati; Hedi Khairi; Ali Mtiraoui
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2011-04-18

4.  Turkish health system reform from the people's perspective: a cross sectional study.

Authors:  Saad Ahmed Ali Jadoo; Syed Mohamed Aljunid; Seher Nur Sulku; Amrizal Muhammad Nur
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 2.655

5.  Portuguese version of the EUROPEP questionnaire: contributions to the psychometric validation.

Authors:  Hugo Roque; Ana Veloso; Pedro L Ferreira
Journal:  Rev Saude Publica       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 2.106

6.  The EUROPEP questionnaire for patient's evaluation of general practice care: Bulgarian experience.

Authors:  Rositsa Dimova; Rumyana Stoyanova; Donka Keskinova
Journal:  Croat Med J       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 1.351

7.  How do patients with a Turkish background evaluate their medical care in Germany? An observational study in primary care.

Authors:  Katja Goetz; Jessica Bungartz; Joachim Szecsenyi; Jost Steinhaeuser
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 2.711

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.