Literature DB >> 15003407

Social and ethnic inequalities in the offer and uptake of prenatal screening and diagnosis in the UK: a systematic review.

R E Rowe1, J Garcia, L L Davidson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review studies addressing the question of whether there are social inequalities in either the offer or the uptake of prenatal testing in the UK.
METHOD: Systematic review of studies assessing the offer or uptake of prenatal screening or diagnosis according to social class or ethnic origin. Electronic databases were searched using a strategy developed for a review of inequalities in access to maternity care supplemented with terms specific to prenatal testing. Further papers were identified from reference lists, citation searches and key organizations.
RESULTS: From over 600 identified papers, 41 were potentially relevant. Twenty met the inclusion criteria. The studies included covered screening and/or diagnosis for Down's syndrome, neural tube defects, haemoglobin disorders and HIV. Many studies were limited by small numbers or poor reporting of data and analysis. Six studies reported data on prenatal testing according to women's social class or educational level. None found any significant social inequalities in testing. Some studies suggested that women of South Asian origin might be up to 70% less likely to receive prenatal testing for haemoglobin disorders and Down's syndrome than White women. A small number of studies suggested that South Asian women might be less likely to be offered testing.
CONCLUSIONS: This review provides some evidence of ethnic inequalities in access to prenatal testing. Further research is required to improve our understanding of why testing may not be offered, the reasons for failure to take up testing when offered, and to identify whether there are other social inequalities in access to prenatal testing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction; Health Care and Public Health

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15003407     DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2003.08.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health        ISSN: 0033-3506            Impact factor:   2.427


  16 in total

Review 1.  Genetic screening: A primer for primary care.

Authors:  Anne Andermann; Ingeborg Blancquaert
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Rates of prenatal screening across health care regions in Ontario, Canada: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Robin Z Hayeems; Michael Campitelli; Xiaomu Ma; Tianhua Huang; Mark Walker; Astrid Guttmann
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2015-04-02

3.  Adverse perinatal outcomes associated with homelessness and substance use in pregnancy.

Authors:  Merry Little; Rajiv Shah; Marian J Vermeulen; Alice Gorman; Darlene Dzendoletas; Joel G Ray
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-09-13       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Haemoglobinopathy screening: an end to institutional racism?

Authors:  Theresa Marteau; Elizabeth Dormandy
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Results of the Recent Immigrant Pregnancy and Perinatal Long-term Evaluation Study (RIPPLES).

Authors:  Joel G Ray; Marian J Vermeulen; Michael J Schull; Gita Singh; Rajiv Shah; Donald A Redelmeier
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2007-05-08       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 6.  Commercial landscape of noninvasive prenatal testing in the United States.

Authors:  Ashwin Agarwal; Lauren C Sayres; Mildred K Cho; Robert Cook-Deegan; Subhashini Chandrasekharan
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.050

7.  Socioeconomic inequalities in outcome of pregnancy and neonatal mortality associated with congenital anomalies: population based study.

Authors:  Lucy K Smith; Judith L S Budd; David J Field; Elizabeth S Draper
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-07-19

8.  Risk and reproductive decisions: British Pakistani couples' responses to genetic counselling.

Authors:  Alison Shaw
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2011-05-17       Impact factor: 4.634

9.  Health behaviour modelling for prenatal diagnosis in Australia: a geodemographic framework for health service utilisation and policy development.

Authors:  Evelyne E Muggli; David McCloskey; Jane L Halliday
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Socioeconomic inequalities in pregnancy outcome associated with Down syndrome: a population-based study.

Authors:  Judith L S Budd; Elizabeth S Draper; Robyn R Lotto; Laura E Berry; Lucy K Smith
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 5.747

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.