OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the current study was to determine if a history of greater exposure to different types of adverse and/or abusive experiences in childhood would influence coping strategies used by undergraduate women to deal with new stressful events in young adulthood. METHOD: A sample of 828 women undergraduates from a New England state university participated in this questionnaire study. Disengagement and engagement coping strategies used in response to recent stressors were compared in groups who had none, one, two, or three or more types of adverse and/or abusive childhood experiences (sexual abuse, physical abuse, witnessing domestic violence, having an alcoholic parent, and parental rejection). RESULTS: There was an increased reliance on disengagement methods of coping (wishful thinking, problem avoidance, social withdrawal, and self-criticism) as a function of more extensive child abuse histories. Engagement methods of coping (problem solving, cognitive restructuring, social support, and express-emotions), however, did not show a corresponding decrease as a function of increased exposure to different types of childhood stressors and/or abuse. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that undergraduate women with cumulative adverse and/or abusive childhood histories are particularly at-risk of relying on maladaptive disengagement coping strategies to deal with various new stressors later in life.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the current study was to determine if a history of greater exposure to different types of adverse and/or abusive experiences in childhood would influence coping strategies used by undergraduate women to deal with new stressful events in young adulthood. METHOD: A sample of 828 women undergraduates from a New England state university participated in this questionnaire study. Disengagement and engagement coping strategies used in response to recent stressors were compared in groups who had none, one, two, or three or more types of adverse and/or abusive childhood experiences (sexual abuse, physical abuse, witnessing domestic violence, having an alcoholic parent, and parental rejection). RESULTS: There was an increased reliance on disengagement methods of coping (wishful thinking, problem avoidance, social withdrawal, and self-criticism) as a function of more extensive child abuse histories. Engagement methods of coping (problem solving, cognitive restructuring, social support, and express-emotions), however, did not show a corresponding decrease as a function of increased exposure to different types of childhood stressors and/or abuse. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that undergraduate women with cumulative adverse and/or abusive childhood histories are particularly at-risk of relying on maladaptive disengagement coping strategies to deal with various new stressors later in life.
Authors: Sarah E Hampson; Grant W Edmonds; Lewis R Goldberg; Maureen Barckley; Bridget Klest; Joan P Dubanoski; Teresa A Hillier Journal: Psychol Trauma Date: 2016-04-21
Authors: Dale J Langford; Bruce Cooper; Steven Paul; Janice Humphreys; Carolyn Keagy; Yvette P Conley; Marilyn J Hammer; Jon D Levine; Fay Wright; Michelle Melisko; Christine Miaskowski; Laura B Dunn Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2017-08-21 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Tracie O Afifi; Murray W Enns; Brian J Cox; Gordon J G Asmundson; Murray B Stein; Jitender Sareen Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2008-04-01 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Maju Mathew Koola; Clifford Qualls; Deanna L Kelly; Kelly Skelton; Bekh Bradley; Richard Amar; Erica J Duncan Journal: J Nerv Ment Dis Date: 2013-04 Impact factor: 2.254