Literature DB >> 15001911

The Impella Recover microaxial left ventricular assist device reduces mortality for postcardiotomy failure: a three-center experience.

M P Siegenthaler1, K Brehm, T Strecker, T Hanke, A Nötzold, M Olschewski, M Weyand, H Sievers, F Beyersdorf.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We evaluated patient outcomes and complications associated with the microaxial Impella Recover left ventricular assist device (Impella Cardiosystems AG, Aachen, Germany) for postcardiotomy low-output syndrome. This low-cost device is inserted across the aortic valve through a 10-mm vascular graft sewn to the ascending aorta.
METHODS: Impella patients were compared with 198 patients treated with an intraoperative intra-aortic balloon pump between January 2000 and December 2002. Three risk scores were used: the Hausmann score, the Texas Heart Institute score, and the Cleveland intensive care unit score. Between September 2001 and March 2003, 24 patients were treated with the Impella Recover for low-output syndrome. Before device insertion, 21 could not be separated from cardiopulmonary bypass, and 3 had postoperative hemodynamic instability despite high-dose catecholamines. Sixteen were treated with the Impella and intra-aortic balloon pump and 8 with the Impella alone (no intra-aortic balloon pump because of peripheral vascular disease or because deemed unnecessary).
RESULTS: No technical problems with device insertion occurred. Pump flow was 3.3 +/- 0.7 L/min at 28,000 +/- 4500 RPM. Support time was 61 +/- 56 hours (range, 7-228 hours). Four devices required repositioning. One device failed (leaking purge line) and was removed. Hemolysis was minimal (lactate dehydrogenase levels of 540 +/- 260 U/dL for Impella survivors). Mortality for Impella patients was 54% (13/24), similar to that for high-risk intra-aortic balloon pump patients (Hausmann score > or =2 [57%], intensive care unit score > or =2 [51%], Texas Heart Institute score > or =0.75 [55%], and cardiac index < or =2.3 [45%]). Cardiac output data were available in 19 Impella patients. Impella patients able to increase their cardiac output to 1 L/min or more above the pump flow of the Impella Recover had a 10% (1/10) mortality, versus 88% (8/9) in patients with a residual cardiac function of 1 L/min or less (P =.001). Comparison of high-risk intra-aortic balloon pump patients with Impella patients with residual cardiac function of 1 L/min or more showed a significant reduction in mortality, regardless of the high-risk definition used. Residual cardiac function was the strongest predictor of survival in Impella patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The Impella Recover device provides 3 to 4 L/min flow. It improves survival in patients with low-output syndrome if the heart is able to pump 1 L/min or more above device flow.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15001911     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2003.09.055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  21 in total

1.  Impella 2.5.

Authors:  Daniel H Raess; David M Weber
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2009-04-02       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Interprovincial spoke-to-hub transport using the Impella Recover LP 5.0 left ventricular assist device as a bridge to long-term circulatory support.

Authors:  Mina Guirgis; Kanwal Kumar; Shelley Zieroth; Roger Philipp; Alan H Menkis; Darren H Freed
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 5.223

Review 3.  Surgical implant techniques of left ventricular assist devices: an overview of acute and durable devices.

Authors:  Bryan A Whitson
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 4.  Extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation for the post-cardiotomy patient.

Authors:  Priyadharshanan Ariyaratnam; Lindsay A McLean; Alexander R J Cale; Mahmoud Loubani
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 5.  A ventricular assist device as a bridge to recovery, decision making, or transplantation in patients with advanced cardiac failure.

Authors:  Siyamek Neragi-Miandoab
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Acute Left Ventricular Unloading Reduces Atrial Stretch and Inhibits Atrial Arrhythmias.

Authors:  Kiyotake Ishikawa; Shin Watanabe; Philyoung Lee; Fadi G Akar; Ahyoung Lee; Olympia Bikou; Kenneth Fish; Changwon Kho; Roger J Hajjar
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 24.094

7.  Successful bridge to recovery using a microaxial blood pump in a patient with electrical storm and cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  A Henning; J Schreieck; R Riessen; M Gawaz; A E May
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2011-10-29       Impact factor: 0.840

Review 8.  Contemporary mechanical circulatory support therapy for postcardiotomy shock.

Authors:  Shinichi Fukuhara; Koji Takeda; Arthur Reshad Garan; Paul Kurlansky; Jonathan Hastie; Yoshifumi Naka; Hiroo Takayama
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016-02-13

Review 9.  Mechanical bridge to decision: what are the options for the management of acute refractory cardiogenic shock?

Authors:  Daniel Goldstein; Siyamek Neragi-Miandoab
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2011-03

10.  The TandemHeart as a bridge to a long-term axial-flow left ventricular assist device (bridge to bridge).

Authors:  Igor D Gregoric; Leon P Jacob; Saverio La Francesca; Brian A Bruckner; William E Cohn; Pranav Loyalka; Biswajit Kar; O H Frazier
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2008
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.