UNLABELLED: The contribution of (18)F-FDG uptake by endothelial cells to uptake values measured by PET in various tissues is as yet unclear. We therefore sought to characterize (18)F-FDG uptake in an in vitro model of human endothelial cells. METHODS: Commercially obtained human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were seeded in 6-multiwell plates 48-96 h before incubation with 1-2 MBq (18)F-FDG per well. Radioactivity measurements were performed after washing and mechanical dissolvation of the cellular monolayers. Cellular (18)F-FDG uptake was referred to protein concentration. This experimental protocol was subsequently varied to study the effect of different parameters of interest. Furthermore, radio-thin-layer chromatography was used to identify intracellular (18)F-FDG metabolites. (18)F-FDG uptake in HUVECs was compared with that by a human monocyte-macrophage (HMM) preparation and by glioblastoma cells (GLIOs) under identical experimental conditions. RESULTS: (18)F-FDG accumulated in HUVECs in a time-dependent manner and was trapped mainly as (18)F-FDG-6-phosphate and (18)F-FDG-1,6-diphosphate. Unlabeled glucose and cytochalasin B competitively inhibited (18)F-FDG uptake, whereas phlorizin had no significant effect. Glucose deprivation significantly enhanced (18)F-FDG uptake by a factor of 2.7, whereas sodium depletion had no significant influence. HUVECs treated with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) showed a significant 82% increase in (18)F-FDG accumulation after a 2-h exposure to 50 ng/mL VEGF. (18)F-FDG uptake in HUVECs was significantly higher than that in HMMs and in the range of the uptake values measured in GLIOs. CONCLUSION: (18)F-FDG accumulates in HUVECs by mechanisms analogous to those in neoplastic cells or neurons. VEGF significantly stimulates endothelial (18)F-FDG uptake. The observed differences in (18)F-FDG uptake between HUVECs, HMMs, and GLIOs are difficult to extrapolate to in vivo conditions but stimulate further studies on the contribution of endothelial (18)F-FDG uptake to the overall uptake of that tracer in neoplastic or vascular lesions.
UNLABELLED: The contribution of (18)F-FDG uptake by endothelial cells to uptake values measured by PET in various tissues is as yet unclear. We therefore sought to characterize (18)F-FDG uptake in an in vitro model of human endothelial cells. METHODS: Commercially obtained human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were seeded in 6-multiwell plates 48-96 h before incubation with 1-2 MBq (18)F-FDG per well. Radioactivity measurements were performed after washing and mechanical dissolvation of the cellular monolayers. Cellular (18)F-FDG uptake was referred to protein concentration. This experimental protocol was subsequently varied to study the effect of different parameters of interest. Furthermore, radio-thin-layer chromatography was used to identify intracellular (18)F-FDG metabolites. (18)F-FDG uptake in HUVECs was compared with that by a human monocyte-macrophage (HMM) preparation and by glioblastoma cells (GLIOs) under identical experimental conditions. RESULTS: (18)F-FDG accumulated in HUVECs in a time-dependent manner and was trapped mainly as (18)F-FDG-6-phosphate and (18)F-FDG-1,6-diphosphate. Unlabeled glucose and cytochalasin B competitively inhibited (18)F-FDG uptake, whereas phlorizin had no significant effect. Glucose deprivation significantly enhanced (18)F-FDG uptake by a factor of 2.7, whereas sodium depletion had no significant influence. HUVECs treated with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) showed a significant 82% increase in (18)F-FDG accumulation after a 2-h exposure to 50 ng/mL VEGF. (18)F-FDG uptake in HUVECs was significantly higher than that in HMMs and in the range of the uptake values measured in GLIOs. CONCLUSION: (18)F-FDG accumulates in HUVECs by mechanisms analogous to those in neoplastic cells or neurons. VEGF significantly stimulates endothelial (18)F-FDG uptake. The observed differences in (18)F-FDG uptake between HUVECs, HMMs, and GLIOs are difficult to extrapolate to in vivo conditions but stimulate further studies on the contribution of endothelial (18)F-FDG uptake to the overall uptake of that tracer in neoplastic or vascular lesions.
Authors: Guido Musch; Tilo Winkler; R Scott Harris; Marcos F Vidal Melo; Tyler J Wellman; Nicolas de Prost; Richard L Kradin; Jose G Venegas Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Donna S Dorow; Carleen Cullinane; Nelly Conus; Peter Roselt; David Binns; Timothy J McCarthy; Grant A McArthur; Rodney J Hicks Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2006-02-01 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: William N William; Apar Pataer; Neda Kalhor; Arlene M Correa; David C Rice; Ignacio I Wistuba; John Heymach; J Jack Lee; Edward S Kim; Reginald Munden; Kathryn A Gold; Vassiliki Papadimitrakopoulou; Stephen G Swisher; Jeremy J Erasmus Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2013-02 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: M Seidensticker; G Ulrich; F L Muehlberg; A Pethe; O S Grosser; I G Steffen; M Stiebler; J Goldschmidt; K H Smalla; R Seidensticker; J Ricke; H Amthauer; K Mohnike Journal: Mol Imaging Biol Date: 2014-04 Impact factor: 3.488
Authors: Robert R Flavell; Charles Truillet; Melanie K Regan; Tanushree Ganguly; Joseph E Blecha; John Kurhanewicz; Henry F VanBrocklin; Kayvan R Keshari; Christopher J Chang; Michael J Evans; David M Wilson Journal: Bioconjug Chem Date: 2015-12-22 Impact factor: 4.774
Authors: Andreas K Buck; Holger Schirrmeister; Torsten Mattfeldt; Sven N Reske Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2004-05-04 Impact factor: 9.236