OBJECTIVE: Natriuretic peptides (NPs) reduce central venous pressure in patients with chronic heart failure (cHF) despite attenuation of arterial, renal, and humoral effects. This suggests a preserved venodilator response. This study had 4 aims: to compare the venodilator effects of human NPs in patients with cHF; to assess the contribution of basal ANP and BNP levels to regulation of forearm vascular volume (FVV); to test the hypothesis that venous ANP responsiveness is preserved in cHF; and to assess the involvement of endothelial nitric oxide-synthase (eNOS) in NP-induced vascular effects. METHODS AND RESULTS: Venous and arterial forearm vascular responses to incremental intra-arterial doses of ANP, Urodilatin, BNP, CNP, or the ANP receptor antagonist A71915 were studied in 53 patients and 11 controls. ANP receptor antagonism reduced FVV by 4.4%+/-1.2% (P<0.05). The forearm blood flow (FBF) response to ANP was significantly blunted in patients versus controls (P<0.01), whereas FVV increased similarly in both groups (maximum 14.7% and 13.4%, both P<0.001). The eNOS blockade reduced ANP-induced FBF changes in controls but not in patients (P<0.05), whereas similar reductions in FVV changes were seen in groups (both P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In cHF venous, but not arterial, ANP responsiveness is preserved. Arterial endothelial dysfunction may contribute to NP resistance.
OBJECTIVE: Natriuretic peptides (NPs) reduce central venous pressure in patients with chronic heart failure (cHF) despite attenuation of arterial, renal, and humoral effects. This suggests a preserved venodilator response. This study had 4 aims: to compare the venodilator effects of human NPs in patients with cHF; to assess the contribution of basal ANP and BNP levels to regulation of forearm vascular volume (FVV); to test the hypothesis that venous ANP responsiveness is preserved in cHF; and to assess the involvement of endothelial nitric oxide-synthase (eNOS) in NP-induced vascular effects. METHODS AND RESULTS: Venous and arterial forearm vascular responses to incremental intra-arterial doses of ANP, Urodilatin, BNP, CNP, or the ANP receptor antagonist A71915 were studied in 53 patients and 11 controls. ANP receptor antagonism reduced FVV by 4.4%+/-1.2% (P<0.05). The forearm blood flow (FBF) response to ANP was significantly blunted in patients versus controls (P<0.01), whereas FVV increased similarly in both groups (maximum 14.7% and 13.4%, both P<0.001). The eNOS blockade reduced ANP-induced FBF changes in controls but not in patients (P<0.05), whereas similar reductions in FVV changes were seen in groups (both P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In cHF venous, but not arterial, ANP responsiveness is preserved. Arterial endothelial dysfunction may contribute to NP resistance.
Authors: Xu Wen Ng; Yingying Huang; Horng H Chen; John C Burnett; Freddy Y C Boey; Subbu S Venkatraman Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-07-04 Impact factor: 3.240