Literature DB >> 15001288

Genotoxicity and cytotoxicity of dental materials in human lymphocytes as assessed by the single cell microgel electrophoresis (comet) assay.

Norbert H Kleinsasser1, Barbara C Wallner, Ulrich A Harréus, Tobias Kleinjung, Matthias Folwaczny, Reinhard Hickel, Kai Kehe, Franz-Xaver Reichl.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Resin monomers may be released from restorative dental materials and can diffuse into the tooth pulp or the gingiva, and can reach the saliva and the circulating blood. Whereas the cytotoxic potential of some components has been clearly documented, possible genotoxicity in human target cells demands further investigation.
METHODS: The Comet assay was used to quantify DNA single strand breaks, alkali labile and incomplete excision repair sites in lymphocytes of 10 volunteers. The xenobiotics investigated were 2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate (HEMA), triethyleneglycoldimethacrylate (TEGDMA), urethane dimethacrylate (UDMA), and bisphenol A-glycidyl methacrylate (Bis-GMA) with N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine and dimethyl sulfoxide as controls. DNA migration was quantified using the tail moment according to Olive (OTM) and DNA migration was considered to be elevated at OTM levels above 2. Cytotoxicity was monitored using trypan blue.
RESULTS: In the negative controls, OTM ranged between 1.0 and 1.2. With HEMA concentrations above 10(-6)M, TEGDMA 10(-3)M, Bis-GMA 10(-4)M, and UDMA above 10(-6)M relevant enhancements of DNA migration (OTM>2) were achieved. At higher concentrations of up to 2.5x10(-2) induced DNA migration was expressed by OTM of 3.3 for HEMA, 4.5 for TEGDMA, 7.4 for Bis-GMA, and 2.8 for UDMA. Relevant cytotoxic effects were also seen but vitality levels were at a critical range of 71% for Bis-GMA and 73% for TEGDMA, only. SIGNIFICANCE: In higher concentration levels, all tested substances induced significant but minor enhancement of DNA migration in the Comet assay as a possible sign for limited genotoxic effects. However, with the highest levels of DNA migration being combined with elevated cytotoxic effects, a low in vivo genotoxic strain appears to be posed by the resin components.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15001288     DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2003.11.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent        ISSN: 0300-5712            Impact factor:   4.379


  16 in total

1.  Transdentinal cytotoxicity of experimental adhesive systems of different hydrophilicity applied to ethanol-saturated dentin.

Authors:  Luciana Bianchi; Ana Paula Dias Ribeiro; Marcela Rocha de Oliveira Carrilho; David H Pashley; Carlos Alberto de Souza Costa; Josimeri Hebling
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 5.304

2.  Potential health impact and genotoxicity analysis of drinking source water from Liuxihe Reservoir (P.R. China).

Authors:  Weili Wang; Mei Li; Yibin Cui; Xiangyu Gao; Kun Chen; Xin Qian
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Genotoxicity in primary human peripheral lymphocytes after exposure to radiopacifiers in vitro.

Authors:  Mariana Gobbo Braz; Joao Paulo de Castro Marcondes; Mariza Akemi Matsumoto; Marco Antonio Hungaro Duarte; Daisy Maria Favero Salvadori; Daniel Araki Ribeiro
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-07-10       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 4.  In vitro and in vivo studies on the toxicity of dental resin components: a review.

Authors:  Michel Goldberg
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2007-11-27       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Release and toxicity of dental resin composite.

Authors:  Saurabh K Gupta; Payal Saxena; Vandana A Pant; Aditya B Pant
Journal:  Toxicol Int       Date:  2012-09

6.  Protective effect of chitosan oligosaccharide lactate against DNA double-strand breaks induced by a model methacrylate dental adhesive.

Authors:  Joanna Szczepanska; Elzbieta Pawlowska; Ewelina Synowiec; Piotr Czarny; Marek Rekas; Janusz Blasiak; Jacek Pawel Szaflik
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2011-08

7.  Independent and combined cytotoxicity and genotoxicity of triethylene glycol dimethacrylate and urethane dimethacrylate.

Authors:  Maria Wisniewska-Jarosinska; Tomasz Poplawski; Cezary J Chojnacki; Elzbieta Pawlowska; Renata Krupa; Joanna Szczepanska; Janusz Blasiak
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 2.316

8.  2-hydroxylethyl methacrylate (HEMA), a tooth restoration component, exerts its genotoxic effects in human gingival fibroblasts trough methacrylic acid, an immediate product of its degradation.

Authors:  Joanna Szczepanska; Tomasz Poplawski; Ewelina Synowiec; Elzbieta Pawlowska; Cezary J Chojnacki; Jan Chojnacki; Janusz Blasiak
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2011-05-27       Impact factor: 2.316

9.  Bisphenol A-glycidyl methacrylate induces a broad spectrum of DNA damage in human lymphocytes.

Authors:  Kinga Drozdz; Daniel Wysokinski; Renata Krupa; Katarzyna Wozniak
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 5.153

10.  Cytotoxicity of Cricula triphenestrata Cocoon Extract on Human Fibroblasts.

Authors:  Siti Sunarintyas; Widowati Siswomihardjo; Alva Edy Tontowi
Journal:  Int J Biomater       Date:  2012-08-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.