PURPOSE: To analyze the impact of radiotherapy (RT) parameters on outcome in a randomized study of pre-RT chemotherapy for M0-M1 medulloblastoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients were randomized to RT alone or RT preceded by chemotherapy with vincristine, etoposide, carboplatin, and cyclophosphamide. RT consisted of craniospinal RT, 35 Gy in 21 fractions, followed by a posterior fossa (PF) boost of 20 Gy in 12 fractions. The accuracy of cribriform fossa, skull base, and PF field placement was assessed. RESULTS:Between 1992 and 2000, 217 patients were randomized, of whom 179 were eligible for analysis. At a median follow-up of 5.4 years, the 3- and 5-year overall survival rate was 79.5% and 70.7%, respectively. The 3- and 5-year event-free survival (EFS) rate was 71.6% and 67.0%, respectively. EFS was significantly better for the chemotherapy plus RT group (3-year EFS rate 78.5% vs. 64.8%, p = 0.0366). Overall survival and EFS were significantly better for patients completing RT within 50 days compared with those taking >50 days to complete RT (3-year overall survival rate 84.1% vs. 70.9%, p = 0.0356, 3-year EFS rate 78.5% vs. 53.7%, p = 0.0092). Multivariate analysis identified the use of chemotherapy (p = 0.0248) and RT duration (p = 0.0100) as predictive of better EFS. Planning films were reviewed for 131 (74.4%) of 176 patients. Sixty-five (49.6%) had no targeting deviations and 58 (44.3%) had one or more deviations. PF recurrence occurred in 11 (34.4%) of 32 with a PF targeting deviation compared with 13 (16.3%) of 80 without (p = 0.043). No statistically significant impact of other targeting deviations on recurrence risk or EFS were found. CONCLUSION: The results of this study have confirmed the importance of the duration of RT for medulloblastoma. Also, attention to detail when planning RT is important, as illustrated in the case of PF field placement.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE: To analyze the impact of radiotherapy (RT) parameters on outcome in a randomized study of pre-RT chemotherapy for M0-M1 medulloblastoma. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients were randomized to RT alone or RT preceded by chemotherapy with vincristine, etoposide, carboplatin, and cyclophosphamide. RT consisted of craniospinal RT, 35 Gy in 21 fractions, followed by a posterior fossa (PF) boost of 20 Gy in 12 fractions. The accuracy of cribriform fossa, skull base, and PF field placement was assessed. RESULTS: Between 1992 and 2000, 217 patients were randomized, of whom 179 were eligible for analysis. At a median follow-up of 5.4 years, the 3- and 5-year overall survival rate was 79.5% and 70.7%, respectively. The 3- and 5-year event-free survival (EFS) rate was 71.6% and 67.0%, respectively. EFS was significantly better for the chemotherapy plus RT group (3-year EFS rate 78.5% vs. 64.8%, p = 0.0366). Overall survival and EFS were significantly better for patients completing RT within 50 days compared with those taking >50 days to complete RT (3-year overall survival rate 84.1% vs. 70.9%, p = 0.0356, 3-year EFS rate 78.5% vs. 53.7%, p = 0.0092). Multivariate analysis identified the use of chemotherapy (p = 0.0248) and RT duration (p = 0.0100) as predictive of better EFS. Planning films were reviewed for 131 (74.4%) of 176 patients. Sixty-five (49.6%) had no targeting deviations and 58 (44.3%) had one or more deviations. PF recurrence occurred in 11 (34.4%) of 32 with a PF targeting deviation compared with 13 (16.3%) of 80 without (p = 0.043). No statistically significant impact of other targeting deviations on recurrence risk or EFS were found. CONCLUSION: The results of this study have confirmed the importance of the duration of RT for medulloblastoma. Also, attention to detail when planning RT is important, as illustrated in the case of PF field placement.
Authors: Thomas E Merchant; Larry E Kun; Matthew J Krasin; Dana Wallace; Murali M Chintagumpala; Shiao Y Woo; David M Ashley; Maree Sexton; Stewart J Kellie; Verity Ahern; Amar Gajjar Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2007-09-24 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Nitin Ohri; Xinglei Shen; Adam P Dicker; Laura A Doyle; Amy S Harrison; Timothy N Showalter Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2013-03-06 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: David J Noble; Daniel Scoffings; Thankamma Ajithkumar; Michael V Williams; Sarah J Jefferies Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2016-09-29 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Cassie N Kline; Roger J Packer; Eugene I Hwang; David R Raleigh; Steve Braunstein; Corey Raffel; Pratiti Bandopadhayay; David A Solomon; Mariam Aboian; Soonmee Cha; Sabine Mueller Journal: Neurooncol Pract Date: 2017-08-11
Authors: Vijay Ramaswamy; Marc Remke; Eric Bouffet; Simon Bailey; Steven C Clifford; Francois Doz; Marcel Kool; Christelle Dufour; Gilles Vassal; Till Milde; Olaf Witt; Katja von Hoff; Torsten Pietsch; Paul A Northcott; Amar Gajjar; Giles W Robinson; Laetitia Padovani; Nicolas André; Maura Massimino; Barry Pizer; Roger Packer; Stefan Rutkowski; Stefan M Pfister; Michael D Taylor; Scott L Pomeroy Journal: Acta Neuropathol Date: 2016-04-04 Impact factor: 17.088
Authors: Brian De; Kathryn Beal; Kevin C De Braganca; Mark M Souweidane; Ira J Dunkel; Yasmin Khakoo; Stephen W Gilheeney; Lisa M DeAngelis; Paul Menzel; Suchit H Patel; Suzanne L Wolden Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2017-10-10 Impact factor: 4.130