Literature DB >> 15000657

Cranial evolution in sakis (Pithecia, Platyrrhini). II: Evolutionary processes and morphological integration.

G Marroig1, M De Vivo, J M Cheverud.   

Abstract

Patterns of interspecific differentiation in saki monkeys (Pithecia) are quantitatively described and possible evolutionary processes producing them are examined. The comparison of species correlation matrices to expected patterns of morphological integration reveal significant and similar patterns of development-based cranial integration among species. Aspects of the facial region are more heavily influenced by general size variation than features of the neural region. The comparison of pooled within- and between-groups V/CV matrices suggests that genetic drift might be a sufficient explanation for saki cranial evolution. Differential natural selection gradients are also reconstructed because selection may also have caused population differentiation through evolutionary time. These gradients illustrate the inherent multivariate nature of selection, being a consequence of the interaction between existing morphological integration (correlation) among traits and the action of natural selection. Yet, our attempt to interpret selection gradients in terms of their functional significance did not result in any clear association between selection and function. Perhaps this is also an indication that morphological evolution in sakis was mostly neutral.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15000657     DOI: 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003.00653.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Evol Biol        ISSN: 1010-061X            Impact factor:   2.411


  14 in total

1.  Modularity in the mammalian dentition: mice and monkeys share a common dental genetic architecture.

Authors:  Leslea J Hlusko; Richard D Sage; Michael C Mahaney
Journal:  J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol       Date:  2011-01-15       Impact factor: 2.656

2.  Evolution of adaptive phenotypic variation patterns by direct selection for evolvability.

Authors:  Mihaela Pavlicev; James M Cheverud; Günter P Wagner
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Detecting genetic drift versus selection in human evolution.

Authors:  Rebecca Rogers Ackermann; James M Cheverud
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-12-16       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Measuring the magnitude of morphological integration: The effect of differences in morphometric representations and the inclusion of size.

Authors:  Fabio A Machado; Alex Hubbe; Diogo Melo; Arthur Porto; Gabriel Marroig
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Craniofacial growth and morphology among intersecting clinical categories.

Authors:  Ryan P Knigge; Anna M Hardin; Kevin M Middleton; Kieran P McNulty; Hee Soo Oh; Manish Valiathan; Dana L Duren; Richard J Sherwood
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 2.227

6.  The influence of modularity on cranial morphological disparity in Carnivora and Primates (Mammalia).

Authors:  Anjali Goswami; P David Polly
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Quantitative Genetics, Pleiotropy, and Morphological Integration in the Dentition of Papio hamadryas.

Authors:  Leslea J Hlusko; Michael C Mahaney
Journal:  Evol Biol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.119

8.  The effect of dietary adaption on cranial morphological integration in capuchins (order Primates, genus Cebus).

Authors:  Jana Makedonska; Barth W Wright; David S Strait
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-26       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Phylogeny, diet, and cranial integration in australodelphian marsupials.

Authors:  Anjali Goswami
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Characterizing the evolutionary path(s) to early Homo.

Authors:  Lauren Schroeder; Charles C Roseman; James M Cheverud; Rebecca R Ackermann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.