Literature DB >> 15000404

Production of transgenic livestock: promise fulfilled.

M B Wheeler1.   

Abstract

The introduction of specific genes into the genome of farm animals and its stable incorporation into the germ line has been a major technological advance in agriculture. Transgenic technology provides a method to rapidly introduce "new" genes into cattle, swine, sheep, and goats without crossbreeding. It is a more extreme methodology, but in essence, not really different from crossbreeding or genetic selection in its result. Methods to produce transgenic animals have been available for more than 20 yr, yet recently lines of transgenic livestock have been developed that have the potential to improve animal agriculture and benefit producers and/or consumers. There are a number of methods that can be used to produce transgenic animals. However, the primary method to date has been the microinjection of genes into the pronuclei of zygotes. This method is one of an array of rapidly developing transgenic methodologies. Another method that has enjoyed recent success is that of nuclear transfer or "cloning." The use of this technique to produce transgenic livestock will profoundly affect the use of transgenic technology in livestock production. Cell-based, nuclear transfer or cloning strategies have several distinct advantages for use in the production of transgenic livestock that cannot be attained using pronuclear injection of DNA. Practical applications of transgenesis in livestock production include enhanced prolificacy and reproductive performance, increased feed utilization and growth rate, improved carcass composition, improved milk production and/or composition, and increased disease resistance. One practical application of transgenics in swine production is to improve milk production and/or composition. To address the problem of low milk production, transgenic swine over-expressing the milk protein bovine alpha-lactalbumin were developed and characterized. The outcomes assessed were milk composition, milk yield, and piglet growth. Our results indicate that transgenic overexpression of milk proteins may provide a means to improve swine lactation performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 15000404     DOI: 10.2527/2003.81suppl_332x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  7 in total

Review 1.  Animal transgenesis: state of the art and applications.

Authors:  Eduardo O Melo; Aurea M O Canavessi; Mauricio M Franco; Rodolfo Rumpf
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  A brief overview of transgenic farm animals.

Authors:  M L Bacci
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.459

3.  Production of endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) over-expressing piglets.

Authors:  Y H Hao; H Y Yong; C N Murphy; D Wax; M Samuel; A Rieke; L Lai; Z Liu; D C Durtschi; V R Welbern; E M Price; R M McAllister; J R Turk; M H Laughlin; R S Prather; E B Rucker
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2006-11-02       Impact factor: 2.788

4.  Lactation performance of transgenic goats expressing recombinant human butyryl-cholinesterase in the milk.

Authors:  Hernan Baldassarre; Duncan K Hockley; Monique Doré; Eric Brochu; Bernard Hakier; Xin Zhao; Vilceu Bordignon
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2007-09-13       Impact factor: 2.788

Review 5.  Gene editing in birds takes flight.

Authors:  Mark E Woodcock; Alewo Idoko-Akoh; Michael J McGrew
Journal:  Mamm Genome       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 2.957

6.  Chromatin structure analysis enables detection of DNA insertions into the mammalian nuclear genome.

Authors:  Challise J Sullivan; Erik D Pendleton; Rachel E Abrams; David L Valente; Michelle L Alvarez; Richard H Griffey; John Dresios
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Rep       Date:  2015-06-10

7.  Targeting Human α-Lactalbumin Gene Insertion into the Goat β-Lactoglobulin Locus by TALEN-Mediated Homologous Recombination.

Authors:  Hongmei Zhu; Jun Liu; Chenchen Cui; Yujie Song; Hengtao Ge; Linyong Hu; Qian Li; Yaping Jin; Yong Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.