Literature DB >> 14999799

Impact of magnetic resonance imaging versus CT on nasopharyngeal carcinoma: primary tumor target delineation for radiotherapy.

Na-Na Chung1, Lai-Lei Ting, Wei-Chung Hsu, Louis Tak Lui, Po-Ming Wang.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Our aim was to assess the capacity of CT versus MRI for delineating to the primary tumor extent of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in treated patients.
METHODS: From December 1997 to April 2000, 258 patients with NPC were enrolled. We focused on the primary tumor extension and the discrepancy between CT and MRI. The delineation of tumor invasion was crucial for determination of the gross tumor volume (GTV) before radiation therapy.
RESULTS: A total of 104 patients (40.3%) had intracranial infiltration detected by MRI, whereas CT showed negative findings (p = 6.879 x 10(-11)). Once the pterygopalatine fossa was involved, the chance of intracranial invasion was increased (96.1%). The detectable percentage of pterygopalatine fossa involvement accompanying intracranial invasion was higher with MRI than with CT (96.1% vs 56.9%).
CONCLUSIONS: More detailed information about T and N classification of NPC was provided by MRI than by CT, which led to better target delineation for radiotherapy. Copyright 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 26: 241-246, 2004

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14999799     DOI: 10.1002/hed.10378

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Head Neck        ISSN: 1043-3074            Impact factor:   3.147


  35 in total

1.  Magnetic resonance imaging staging of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the head and neck.

Authors:  Ann Dorothy King; Kunwar Suryaveer Singh Bhatia
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2010-05-28

2.  Morphological study of the pterygoid canal with high-resolution CT.

Authors:  Junrong Chen; Jiahe Xiao
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-06-15

3.  Head and neck cancer: how imaging predicts treatment outcome.

Authors:  Robert Hermans
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2006-10-31       Impact factor: 3.909

Review 4.  The evolution of nasopharyngeal carcinoma staging.

Authors:  Rui Guo; Yan-Ping Mao; Ling-Long Tang; Lei Chen; Ying Sun; Jun Ma
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Impact of Neuroradiology-Based Peer Review on Head and Neck Radiotherapy Target Delineation.

Authors:  S Braunstein; C M Glastonbury; J Chen; J M Quivey; S S Yom
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-11-03       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Error in the parotid contour delineated using computed tomography images rather than magnetic resonance images during radiotherapy planning for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Chengxin Liu; Xudong Kong; Guanzhong Gong; Tonghai Liu; Baosheng Li; Yong Yin
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2014-02-21       Impact factor: 2.374

7.  Added value of a single-energy projection-based metal-artifact reduction algorithm for the computed tomography evaluation of oral cavity cancers.

Authors:  Kenichiro Hirata; Daisuke Utsunomiya; Seitaro Oda; Masafumi Kidoh; Yoshinori Funama; Hideaki Yuki; Morikatsu Yoshida; Yasuyuki Yamashita
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 2.374

8.  Decreased 3D observer variation with matched CT-MRI, for target delineation in Nasopharynx cancer.

Authors:  Coen R N Rasch; Roel J H M Steenbakkers; Isabelle Fitton; Joop C Duppen; Peter J C M Nowak; Frank A Pameijer; Avraham Eisbruch; Johannes H A M Kaanders; Frank Paulsen; Marcel van Herk
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 3.481

9.  Validation of bidimensional measurement in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Authors:  Ting-Shou Chang; Sau-Tung Chu; Yu-Yi Hou; Kuo-Ping Chang; Chao-Chuan Chi; Ching-Chih Lee
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 10.  Defining the target for radiotherapy of head and neck cancer.

Authors:  S Nuyts
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.