Literature DB >> 14999558

[Satisfaction of geriatric patients with their pain therapy. Wish and reality].

M Schuler1, D Razus, P Oster, K Hauer.   

Abstract

AIM: The goal of this study was to determine the level of satisfaction of geriatric patients with their pain therapy, their wishes for improved treatment, and possible influencing factors.
METHODS: From April to November 2002, all patients able to communicate ( n=1432) were included in the study if they had reported pain in the previous 7 days or were taking regular analgesic medication without specifying pain.
RESULTS: Of the geriatric patients reporting from home, 36.4% were not satisfied with their pain therapy up to that time, and 25.4% of surgical patients were dissatisfied as were 28.5% of patients treated in other departments. A total of 93.3% desired better pain treatment. Independent predictors for dissatisfaction with their therapy or wish for improvement were increasing pain intensity, frequent concomitant complaints in addition to pain, and the objectively perceived everyday competence.
CONCLUSION: This study supports the observation that competent pain therapy is necessary and that there is room for improvement in geriatric facilities. Measuring pain intensity, posing questions pertaining to satisfaction with pain therapy, and determining whether patients desire better pain treatment are all indispensable for optimal care. Pain therapy should equally address reduction of pain intensity and management of other complaints.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14999558     DOI: 10.1007/s00482-004-0313-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Schmerz        ISSN: 0932-433X            Impact factor:   1.107


  22 in total

1.  FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION: THE BARTHEL INDEX.

Authors:  F I MAHONEY; D W BARTHEL
Journal:  Md State Med J       Date:  1965-02

2.  Pain assessment in cognitively impaired and unimpaired older adults: a comparison of four scales.

Authors:  J T Chibnall; R C Tait
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 6.961

3.  Performance status assessment in cancer patients.

Authors:  C Conill; E Verger; M Salamero
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1990-04-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  The treatment of chronic cancer pain in a cancer hospital in The Netherlands.

Authors:  R de Wit; F van Dam; A Vielvoye-Kerkmeer; C Mattern; H H Abu-Saad
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.612

5.  Comparison of selected pain assessment tools for use with the elderly.

Authors:  K A Herr; P R Mobily
Journal:  Appl Nurs Res       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 2.257

Review 6.  Principles of perioperative pain management in older adults.

Authors:  F M Gloth
Journal:  Clin Geriatr Med       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 3.076

7.  [A structured pain interview for geriatric patients].

Authors:  H D Basler; R Bloem; H R Casser; H U Gerbershagen; N Griessinger; U Hankemeier; S Hesselbarth; S Lautenbacher; T Nikolaus; W Richter; C Schröter; L Weiss
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.107

8.  Elder beliefs: blocks to pain management.

Authors:  S L Hofland
Journal:  J Gerontol Nurs       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 1.254

Review 9.  Gender variations in clinical pain experience.

Authors:  A M Unruh
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.961

10.  [Problems recognizing pain in geriatrics].

Authors:  M Schuler; M Hestermann; K Hauer; G Schlierf; P Oster
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.107

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  [Status and perspectives of pain and pain therapy in old age : Plea for better care of geriatric pain patients].

Authors:  Corinna Drebenstedt; Matthias Schuler
Journal:  Z Gerontol Geriatr       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 1.281

2.  [Increasing importance of opioids in geriatrics].

Authors:  M Schuler; P Oster
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.107

3.  [Complaints under analgesics: the difficult interpretation by older patients].

Authors:  M Schuler; D Razus; P Oster
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 1.107

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.