Literature DB >> 14998953

Uterine position at real embryo transfer compared with mock embryo transfer.

M B Henne1, A A Milki.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the consistency in the uterine position between mock and real embryo transfer.
METHODS: We reviewed 996 consecutive embryo transfer cycles (585 patients); 74% of patients had an anteverted (AV) uterus and 26% had a retroverted (RV) uterus at mock embryo transfer. All mock and real embryo transfers were performed under abdominal ultrasound guidance.
RESULTS: Of 623 fresh embryo transfers in patients with an AV uterus at mock embryo transfer, only 2% became RV, while 55% of 213 embryo transfers in patients with an RV uterus on mock embryo transfer converted to AV at real embryo transfer (P < 0.0001). For frozen-thawed embryo transfer, 12% of AV uteri at mock embryo transfer became RV, while 33% of RV uteri became AV (P = 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that an RV uterus at mock embryo transfer will often change position at real embryo transfer. Misdirecting the embryo transfer catheter can be avoided by accurate knowledge of the uterine position at the time of embryo transfer, which can be more accurately assessed by routine ultrasound guidance. Additionally, patients with an RV uterus at mock embryo transfer should still present with a full bladder for embryo transfer, since a significant number will convert to an AV position.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14998953     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deh116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  7 in total

1.  The pre-cycle blind mock embryo transfer is an inaccurate predictor of anticipated embryo transfer depth.

Authors:  Kristin L Miller; John L Frattarelli
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2007-01-11       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  The retroverted uterus: ignored to date but core to prolapse.

Authors:  Bernard T Haylen
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2006-07-05

3.  Embryo afterloading: a refinement in embryo transfer technique that may increase clinical pregnancy.

Authors:  Adrienne B Neithardt; James H Segars; Sasha Hennessy; Aidita N James; Jeffrey L McKeeby
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Predictive factors influencing pregnancy rate in frozen embryo transfer.

Authors:  Nao Hayashi; Noritoshi Enatsu; Toshiro Iwasaki; Junko Otsuki; Yukiko Matsumoto; Shoji Kokeguchi; Masahide Shiotani
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2020-03-11

5.  Outcome of mock embryo transfer before the first IVF cycle: A randomized control trial.

Authors:  Amol Borkar; Amit Shah; Anil Gudi; Roy Homburg
Journal:  Int J Reprod Biomed       Date:  2020-11-22

Review 6.  Evidence and consensus on technical aspects of embryo transfer.

Authors:  Arianna D'Angelo; Costas Panayotidis; Alessandra Alteri; Saria Mcheik; Zdravka Veleva
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2022-09-06

7.  Correlation of technical difficulty during embryo transfer with rate of clinical pregnancy.

Authors:  Neeta Singh; Prerna Gupta; Suneeta Mittal; Neena Malhotra
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2012-09
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.