Literature DB >> 14998853

Phase II trial of cisplatin and gemcitabine in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

S M De Lange1, C J van Groeningen, J R Kroep, A Van Bochove, J F Snijders, G J Peters, H M Pinedo, G Giaccone.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This phase II study was performed to determine the efficacy and toxicity of cisplatin and gemcitabine in patients with advanced gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty chemo-naïve patients with measurable locoregionally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer were included; the median patient age was 53 years (range 35-71). Cisplatin was administered at a dose of 50 mg/m2, given in 1 h intravenously (i.v.) on days 1 and 8, followed after 24 h by gemcitabine at a dose of 800 mg/m2 given in 30 min i.v. on days 2, 9 and 16, every 28 days.
RESULTS: A median number of four therapy cycles were given (range 2-8). Myelosuppresion was the most important toxicity. Grade 3-4 thrombopenia was observed in 19 patients (48%) and grade 3-4 leukopenia was observed in 23 (58%). Myelotoxicity was cumulative and caused omission of gemcitabine on day 16 in 55% of cycles. Non-haematological toxicity consisted mainly of grade 1-2 nausea and vomiting. Objective responses were observed in 30% of patients including two complete remissions and 10 partial remissions. Median survival was 11 months (range 3-27+).
CONCLUSIONS: This cisplatin-gemcitabine regimen had moderate efficacy in patients with advanced gastric cancer, with manageable toxicity. Further studies with this combination may be warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14998853     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdh109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  7 in total

1.  Manipulation of olfactory tight junctions using papaverine to enhance intranasal delivery of gemcitabine to the brain.

Authors:  Mansi Krishan; Gary A Gudelsky; Pankaj B Desai; Mary Beth Genter
Journal:  Drug Deliv       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 6.419

2.  Tumor profiling of gastric and esophageal carcinoma reveal different treatment options.

Authors:  John T Miura; Joanne Xiu; James Thomas; Ben George; Benjamin R Carron; Susan Tsai; Fabian M Johnston; Kiran K Turaga; T Clark Gamblin
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2015-03-16       Impact factor: 4.742

3.  Phase II study of gemcitabine and cisplatin in locally advanced/metastatic oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  J Millar; P Scullin; A Morrison; B McClory; L Wall; D Cameron; H Philips; A Price; D Dunlop; M Eatock
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2005-11-14       Impact factor: 7.640

4.  Extremely high expression of serum alpha-fetoprotein level of gastric adenocarcinoma: a rare case with an unexpected well-prognosis.

Authors:  Weihua Gong; Dawei Shou; Ping Gong
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-12-01

Review 5.  Molecular Characterization of Gastric Carcinoma: Therapeutic Implications for Biomarkers and Targets.

Authors:  Lionel Kankeu Fonkoua; Nelson S Yee
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2018-03-09

Review 6.  Intranasal delivery: An attractive route for the administration of nucleic acid based therapeutics for CNS disorders.

Authors:  Pranav Shah; Manisha Lalan; Kalyani Barve
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-08-30       Impact factor: 5.988

7.  Alpha-fetoprotein-producing nonmetastatic gastric adenocarcinoma: a rare entity.

Authors:  A Vivekanandarajah; J P Atallah; S Gupta
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2014-06
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.