Literature DB >> 14998841

A phase III randomised study comparing two different dose-intensity regimens as induction chemotherapy followed by thoracic irradiation in patients with advanced locoregional non-small-cell lung cancer.

J-P Sculier1, J-J Lafitte, T Berghmans, P Van Houtte, J Lecomte, J Thiriaux, A Efremidis, G Koumakis, V Giner, M Richez, J-L Corhay, P Wackenier, P Lothaire, M Paesmans, P Mommen, V Ninane.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the role of chemotherapy dose intensity in patients with initially unresectable non-metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with survival as primary end point, by testing two different regimens as induction chemotherapy followed by thoracic irradiation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients had pathologically proven NSCLC, an initially unresectable non-metastatic tumour without homolateral malignant pleural effusion, no prior history of malignancy and had received no prior therapy. Treatment was randomised for chemotherapy between three courses of MIP (mitomycin C 6 mg/m2; ifosfamide 3 g/m2; cisplatin 50 mg/m2) or SuperMIP (mitomycin C 6 mg/m2; ifosfamide 4.5 g/m2; cisplatin 60 mg/m2, carboplatine 200 mg/m2), followed by chest irradiation (60 Gy; five times per week, for 6 weeks). If the tumour became resectable after chemotherapy, surgery was performed, followed by mediastinal irradiation.
RESULTS: A total of 351 patients were eligible: 176 in the MIP arm and 175 in the SuperMIP arm, with 43% and 51% stages IIIA and IIIB, respectively. There was a significantly higher objective response rate with SuperMIP (46%) compared with MIP (35%) (P=0.03) [95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference between the response rates, 1% to 22%]. After induction chemotherapy, surgery was performed in 54 (15%) patients (27 per arm) and chest irradiation in 203 (57%) patients (102 in the MIP arm and 101 in the SuperMIP). In terms of survival, there was no statistically significant difference between the two study arms (P=0.16), with median survival times of, for MIP and SuperMIP, respectively, 12.5 (95% CI 10.1-14.9) and 11.2 (95% CI 9.7-12.8) months. Haematological toxicity and dosage reductions were higher with SuperMIP, which was nevertheless associated with a significantly increased absolute dose intensity.
CONCLUSIONS: High dose-intensity induction chemotherapy does not improve survival in initially unresectable non metastatic NSCLC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14998841     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdh105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  3 in total

1.  Prognostic factors in stage III non-small cell lung cancer: a review of conventional, metabolic and new biological variables.

Authors:  Thierry Berghmans; Marianne Paesmans; Jean-Paul Sculier
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 8.168

2.  Chemotherapy of lung cancer: A global perspective of the role of ifosfamide.

Authors:  Caicun Zhou; Christian Manegold
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2012-03

3.  First-line treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic squamous non-small cell lung cancer: systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lisa M Hess; Amy M DeLozier; Fanni Natanegara; Xiaofei Wang; Victoria Soldatenkova; Alan Brnabic; Stephen L Able; Jacqueline Brown
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 2.895

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.