Jasper Dingemanse1, Paul L M van Giersbergen. 1. Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Gewerbestrasse 18, 4123 Allschwil, Switzerland. jasper.dingemanse@actelion.com
Abstract
AIMS: To investigate the effect of mild liver impairment on the pharmacokinetics of tezosentan. METHODS: Eleven patients with mild liver impairment and eight healthy subjects received an intravenous infusion of 50 mg h-1 tezosentan for 1 h. Plasma and urine concentrations were determined during and following termination of the infusion. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetic parameters presented as geometric means [95% confidence interval (CI)] for clearance, volume of distribution and terminal half-life were 30 (22, 40) and 42 (36, 48) l h-1, 28 (19, 42) and 19 (16, 23) l, and 4.5 (2.9, 7.0) and 3.6 (2.9, 4.5) h in liver patients and healthy subjects, respectively. The ratios (liver patients/healthy subjects) of these geometric means (95% CI) were 0.71 (0.47, 1.1), 1.5 (0.87, 2.6), and 1.3 (0.69, 2.3), respectively. A two-compartment model accurately fitted the concentration-time data. In both groups approximately 4% of the dose was excreted unchanged into urine. CONCLUSIONS: Although there was a slight trend towards a decreased clearance, the pharmacokinetics of tezosentan in patients with mild liver impairment were similar to those in healthy subjects. Therefore, no dose adaptation seems to be needed in this patient population.
AIMS: To investigate the effect of mild liver impairment on the pharmacokinetics of tezosentan. METHODS: Eleven patients with mild liver impairment and eight healthy subjects received an intravenous infusion of 50 mg h-1 tezosentan for 1 h. Plasma and urine concentrations were determined during and following termination of the infusion. RESULTS: The pharmacokinetic parameters presented as geometric means [95% confidence interval (CI)] for clearance, volume of distribution and terminal half-life were 30 (22, 40) and 42 (36, 48) l h-1, 28 (19, 42) and 19 (16, 23) l, and 4.5 (2.9, 7.0) and 3.6 (2.9, 4.5) h in liver patients and healthy subjects, respectively. The ratios (liver patients/healthy subjects) of these geometric means (95% CI) were 0.71 (0.47, 1.1), 1.5 (0.87, 2.6), and 1.3 (0.69, 2.3), respectively. A two-compartment model accurately fitted the concentration-time data. In both groups approximately 4% of the dose was excreted unchanged into urine. CONCLUSIONS: Although there was a slight trend towards a decreased clearance, the pharmacokinetics of tezosentan in patients with mild liver impairment were similar to those in healthy subjects. Therefore, no dose adaptation seems to be needed in this patient population.
Authors: Didier Lebrec; Jaime Bosch; Rajiv Jalan; Francis J Dudley; Rada Jessic; Richard Moreau; Juan Carlos Garcia-Pagan; Rajeshwar P Mookerjee; Eleonora Chiossi; Paul L M Van Giersbergen; Andjela Kusic-Pajic; Jasper Dingemanse Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2011-11-20 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Douglas G Farmer; Fady Kaldas; Dean Anselmo; Masamichi Katori; Xiu-Da Shen; Charles Lassman; Marian Kaldas; Martine Clozel; Ronald W Busuttil; Jerzy Kupiec-Weglinski Journal: Liver Transpl Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 5.799