Literature DB >> 14996885

Influence of humeral prosthesis height on biomechanics of glenohumeral abduction. An in vitro study.

Richard W Nyffeler1, Ralph Sheikh, Hilaire A C Jacob, Christian Gerber.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: During shoulder replacement surgery, the normal height of the proximal part of the humerus relative to the tuberosities frequently is not restored because of differences in prosthetic geometry or problems with surgical technique. The purpose of the present study was to determine the effect of humeral prosthesis height on range of motion and on the moment arms of the rotator cuff muscles during glenohumeral abduction.
METHODS: Tendon excursions and abduction angles were recorded simultaneously in six cadaveric specimens during passive glenohumeral abduction in the scapular plane. Moment arms were calculated for each muscle by computing the slope of the tendon excursion-versus-glenohumeral abduction angle relationship. The experiments were carried out with the intact joint and after replacement of the humeral head with a prosthesis that was inserted in an anatomically correct position as well as 5 and 10 mm too high.
RESULTS: Insertion of the prosthesis in positions that were 5 and 10 mm too high resulted in significant and marked reductions of the maximum abduction angle of 10 degrees (range, 5 degrees to 18 degrees ) and 16 degrees (range, 12 degrees to 20 degrees ), respectively. In addition, the moment arms of the infraspinatus and subscapularis decreased by 4 to 10 mm. This corresponded to a 20% to 50% decrease of the abduction moment arms of the infraspinatus and an approximately 50% to 100% decrease of the abduction moment arms of the subscapularis, depending on the abduction angle and the part of the muscle being considered.
CONCLUSIONS: If a humeral head prosthesis is placed too high relative to the tuberosities, shoulder function is impaired by two potential mechanisms: (1) the inferior capsule becomes tight at lower abduction angles and limits abduction, and (2) the center of rotation is displaced upward in relation to the line of action of the rotator cuff muscles, resulting in smaller moment arms and decreased abduction moments of the respective muscles. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: In patients managed with shoulder replacement surgery, limitation of range of motion, loss of abduction strength, and overload with long-term failure of the supraspinatus tendon are potential consequences of positioning the humeral head of the prosthesis proximal to the anatomic position.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14996885     DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200403000-00017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  25 in total

1.  Variability of medial and posterior offset in patients with fourth-generation stemmed shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ulrich Irlenbusch; Alexander Berth; Georges Blatter; Peter Zenz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Prospective study of double-eccentric hemi shoulder arthroplasty in different aetiologies: midterm results.

Authors:  Ulrich Irlenbusch; Georges Blatter; Katja Gebhardt; Geza Pap; Peter Zenz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Differences in reconstruction of the anatomy with modern adjustable compared to second-generation shoulder prosthesis.

Authors:  Ulrich Irlenbusch; Steffen End; Mustafa Kilic
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-07-13       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Does an increase in modularity improve the outcomes of total shoulder replacement? Comparison across design generations.

Authors:  Bradley Schoch; Jean-David Werthel; Cathy Schleck; John W Sperling; Robert H Cofield
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Geometrical analysis of stemless shoulder arthroplasty: a radiological study of seventy TESS total shoulder prostheses.

Authors:  Bakir Kadum; Hamid Hassany; Mats Wadsten; Arkan Sayed-Noor; Göran Sjödén
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Variation in external rotation moment arms among subregions of supraspinatus, infraspinatus, and teres minor muscles.

Authors:  Joseph E Langenderfer; Cameron Patthanacharoenphon; James E Carpenter; Richard E Hughes
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Comparison of model-predicted and measured moment arms for the rotator cuff muscles.

Authors:  Christopher J Gatti; Clark R Dickerson; Edward K Chadwick; Amy G Mell; Richard E Hughes
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2007-03-28       Impact factor: 2.063

8.  Humeral head sizing using extra-articular landmarks on conventional radiographs.

Authors:  David D Savin; Hristo Piponov; Jeffrey Goldstein; Ari R Youderian
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 1.246

9.  [Indication for primary fracture prosthesis of the shoulder].

Authors:  C Kirchhoff; P Biberthaler
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.000

10.  Trabecular metal™ shoulder prosthesis in the treatment of complex proximal humeral fractures.

Authors:  Fenglong Li; Chunyan Jiang
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.