Literature DB >> 14996780

Soluble RANKL and risk of nontraumatic fracture.

Georg Schett1, Stefan Kiechl, Kurt Redlich, Friedrich Oberhollenzer, Siegfried Weger, Georg Egger, Agnes Mayr, Josef Jocher, Qingbo Xu, Peter Pietschmann, Steven Teitelbaum, Josef Smolen, Johann Willeit.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: The receptor activator of nuclear factor kappaB ligand (RANKL) is essential for osteoclast and, possibly, osteoblast activation and may represent a key link between bone formation and resorption.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship between serum level of RANKL and the risk of nontraumatic fracture. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: As part of a prospective population-based study conducted in Bruneck, Italy, we recorded all fractures that occurred between 1990 and 2000 in 906 participants and classified them as traumatic (n = 115) or nontraumatic (n = 31). Serum levels of RANKL and osteoprotegerin and characteristics of bone metabolism and lifestyle were assessed in 1990 and at follow-up in 1995 and 2000. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Incident nontraumatic fracture by levels of RANKL.
RESULTS: Levels of RANKL did not differ between sexes and were not related to age, menopausal status, lifestyle characteristics, or data from bone ultrasound at the heel. However, RANKL emerged as a significant predictor of nontraumatic fracture. In pooled logistic regression analysis, the relative risks of nontraumatic fracture in the lowest and middle vs highest tertile for RANKL were 10.0 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.3-43.1) and 3.9 (95% CI, 0.8-19.0) (P<.001 for trend), respectively. Patients in the highest-tertile group had a low risk of fracture even in the presence of other predisposing factors, whereas women aged 60 years or older in the lowest tertile had a 5-year rate of nontraumatic fracture greater than 7%.
CONCLUSIONS: A low level of RANKL is an independent predictor of nontraumatic fracture. This finding is consistent with the hypothesis of an important role of RANKL in human bone turnover and if confirmed in future investigations may gain relevance for assessment of fracture risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14996780     DOI: 10.1001/jama.291.9.1108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  45 in total

Review 1.  Biochemical markers of bone turnover in the clinical development of drugs for osteoporosis and metastatic bone disease: potential uses and pitfalls.

Authors:  Serge Cremers; Patrick Garnero
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Reduced bone mass and preserved marrow adipose tissue in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases in long-term remission.

Authors:  C M Bastos; I M Araújo; M H Nogueira-Barbosa; C E G Salmon; F J A de Paula; L E A Troncon
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Osteocytes as mechanosensors in the inhibition of bone resorption due to mechanical loading.

Authors:  Lidan You; Sara Temiyasathit; Peling Lee; Chi Hyun Kim; Padmaja Tummala; Wei Yao; Wade Kingery; Amanda M Malone; Ronald Y Kwon; Christopher R Jacobs
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2007-09-26       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  The contribution of serum osteoprotegerin to bone mass and vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Pedro Mezquita-Raya; Magdalena de la Higuera; Diego Fernández García; Guillermo Alonso; María Estrella Ruiz-Requena; Juan de Dios Luna; Fernando Escobar-Jiménez; Manuel Muñoz-Torres
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-02-12       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 5.  Osteoprotegerin as a potential therapy for osteoporosis.

Authors:  Neveen A T Hamdy
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.096

6.  Circulating RANKL and RANKL/OPG and Breast Cancer Risk by ER and PR Subtype: Results from the EPIC Cohort.

Authors:  Danja Sarink; Helena Schock; Theron Johnson; Kim Overvad; Marianne Holm; Anne Tjønneland; Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault; Mathilde His; Marina Kvaskoff; Heiner Boeing; Pagona Lagiou; Eleni-Maria Papatesta; Antonia Trichopoulou; Domenico Palli; Valeria Pala; Amalia Mattiello; Rosario Tumino; Carlotta Sacerdote; H B As Bueno-de-Mesquita; Carla H van Gils; Petra H Peeters; Elisabete Weiderpass; Antonio Agudo; Maria-José Sánchez; Maria-Dolores Chirlaque; Eva Ardanaz; Pilar Amiano; Kay Tee Khaw; Ruth Travis; Laure Dossus; Mark Gunter; Sabina Rinaldi; Melissa Merritt; Elio Riboli; Rudolf Kaaks; Renée T Fortner
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2017-07-12

Review 7.  Hepatic osteodystrophy.

Authors:  Angelo Gatta; Alberto Verardo; Marco Di Pascoli; Sandro Giannini; Massimo Bolognesi
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2014-09

8.  Biomarkers of the osteoprotegerin pathway: clinical correlates, subclinical disease, incident cardiovascular disease, and mortality.

Authors:  Wolfgang Lieb; Philimon Gona; Martin G Larson; Joseph M Massaro; Izabella Lipinska; John F Keaney; Jian Rong; Diane Corey; Udo Hoffmann; Caroline S Fox; Ramachandran S Vasan; Emelia J Benjamin; Christopher J O'Donnell; Sekar Kathiresan
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2010-05-06       Impact factor: 8.311

9.  Circulating Receptor Activator of Nuclear Factor-κB (RANK), RANK ligand (RANKL), and Mammographic Density in Premenopausal Women.

Authors:  Adetunji T Toriola; Catherine M Appleton; Xiaoyu Zong; Jingqin Luo; Katherine Weilbaecher; Rulla M Tamimi; Graham A Colditz
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2018-10-23

10.  Bone loss in relation to serum levels of osteoprotegerin and nuclear factor-kappaB ligand: the Tromsø Study.

Authors:  L Jørgensen; A Vik; N Emaus; J Brox; J-B Hansen; E Mathiesen; P Vestergaard
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-08-22       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.