Literature DB >> 14995024

How to avoid the reviewer's axe: one editor's view.

Stephen D Senturia.   

Abstract

Based on his many years of experience, a JMEMS editor provides guidelines for authors that will, if followed, greatly reduce the risk of a devastatingly negative result from the review process. The premise is that there are certain things that rightfully anger reviewers, and, once angered, the reviewers become both negative and aggressive in their judgments--hence, the imagery of "the reviewer's axe" and how to avoid it.

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14995024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control        ISSN: 0885-3010            Impact factor:   2.725


  4 in total

1.  Label-Free Impedance Biosensors: Opportunities and Challenges.

Authors:  Jonathan S Daniels; Nader Pourmand
Journal:  Electroanalysis       Date:  2007-05-16       Impact factor: 3.223

2.  Publishing a scientific manuscript on manual therapy.

Authors:  Chad Cook; Jean-Michel Brismée; Carol Courtney; Mark Hancock; Stephen May
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2009

3.  A survey of orthopaedic journal editors determining the criteria of manuscript selection for publication.

Authors:  Caroline B Hing; Deborah Higgs; Lee Hooper; Simon T Donell; Fujian Song
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2011-04-28       Impact factor: 2.359

4.  Pitfalls in Article Submissions for Publication.

Authors:  Brijesh Nair
Journal:  Indian Dermatol Online J       Date:  2020-11-08
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.