Literature DB >> 14994884

Treatment effects produced by the Bionator appliance. Comparison with an untreated Class II sample.

Marcio R Almeida1, José F C Henriques, Renato R Almeida, Renata R Almeida-Pedrin, Weber Ursi.   

Abstract

The purpose of this retrospective investigation was to evaluate the dentoalveolar and skeletal cephalometric changes of the Bionator appliance on individuals with a Class II division 1 malocclusion. Lateral cephalograms of 44 patients were divided into two equal groups. The control group comprised 22 untreated Class II children (11 males, 11 females), with an initial mean age of 8 years 7 months who were followed without treatment for a period of 13 months. The Bionator group (11 males, 11 females) had an initial mean age of 10 years 8 months, and were treated for a mean period of 16 months. Lateral cephalometric headfilms were obtained of each patient and control at the beginning and end of treatment. The results showed that there were no changes in forward growth of the maxilla in the experimental group compared with the control group. However, the Bionator treatment produced a statistically significant increase in mandibular protrusion, and in total mandibular and body lengths. There were no statistically significant differences in craniofacial growth direction between the Bionator group and the control group, although the treated patients demonstrated a greater increase in posterior face height. The Bionator appliance produced labial tipping of the lower incisors and lingual inclination of the upper incisors, as well as a significant increase (P < 0.01) in mandibular posterior dentoalveolar height. The major effects of the Bionator appliance were dentoalveolar, with a smaller significant skeletal effect. The results indicate that the correction of a Class II division 1 malocclusion with the Bionator appliance is achieved not only by a combination of mandibular skeletal effects, but also by significant dentoalveolar changes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14994884     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/26.1.65

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  11 in total

1.  Effectiveness of bionator therapy for Class II malocclusions: a comparative long-term study.

Authors:  J Kochel; P Meyer-Marcotty; E Witt; A Stellzig-Eisenhauer
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Dentoskeletal effects of functional appliances vs bimaxillary surgery in hyperdivergent Class II patients.

Authors:  Adebimpe O Ibitayo; Valmy Pangrazio-Kulbersh; Jeff Berger; Burcu Bayirli
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Effect of Bionator and Farmand Appliance on the Treatment of Mandibular Deficiency in Prepubertal Stage.

Authors:  Hamidreza Pakshir; Ali Mokhtar; Alireza Darnahal; Zinat Kamali; Mohammad Hadi Behesti; Abdolreza Jamilian
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2017-03-01

4.  Treatment effects of the Jasper Jumper and the Bionator associated with fixed appliances.

Authors:  Leniana Santos Neves; Guilherme Janson; Rodrigo Hermont Cançado; Karina Jerônimo Rodrigues Santiago de Lima; Thaís Maria Freire Fernandes; José Fernando Castanha Henriques
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 2.750

5.  A Cephalometric Comparison of Twin Block and Bionator Appliances in Treatment of Class II Malocclusion.

Authors:  Fatemeh Ahmadian-Babaki; S Mehdi Araghbidi-Kashani; Saeedeh Mokhtari
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2017-01-01

6.  Dentoskeletal modifications in Class II deep bite malocclusion treatment with anterior bite plane functional appliance.

Authors:  Domenico Ciavarella; Michele Laurenziello; Laura Guida; Graziano Montaruli; Crescenzio Gallo; Michele Tepedino; Lorenzo Lo Muzio
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2017-08-01

7.  A Prospective Study Comparing Adolescent and Post-Adolescent Periods Regarding Effects of Activator Appliance in Patients with Class II Mandibular Retrognathia by Using 3dMDface Analysis and Cephalometry.

Authors:  Esra Yüksel Coşkun; Elçin Esenlik
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2020-06-26

8.  Long-term dentoskeletal changes with the Bionator, Herbst, Twin Block, and MARA functional appliances.

Authors:  Nicole J Siara-Olds; Valmy Pangrazio-Kulbersh; Jeff Berger; Burcu Bayirli
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  IGF-1 TMJ injections enhance mandibular growth and bone quality in juvenile rats.

Authors:  Ashwini S Joshi; Nan E Hatch; Takayuki Hayami; Andrew Jheon; Sunil Kapila
Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 2.563

10.  Stability of Class II treatment with the Bionator followed by fixed appliances.

Authors:  Manoela Fávaro Francisconi; José Fernando Castanha Henriques; Guilherme Janson; Karina Maria Salvatore de Freitas; Patrícia Bittencourt Dutra dos Santos
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.698

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.