Lex W Doyle1. 1. Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Royal Women's Hospital, 132 Grattan St, Carlton, Victoria 3053, Australia. lwd@unimelb.edu.au
Abstract
CONTEXT: Although individual components of neonatal intensive care have proven efficacy, doubts remain about its overall effectiveness. OBJECTIVE: To determine the changes in effectiveness of neonatal intensive care for extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants over 2 decades. DESIGN: Population-based cohort study of consecutive ELBW infants born during 4 distinct eras: 1979-1980, 1985-1987, 1991-1992, and 1997, all followed to at least 2 years of age. SETTING: The state of Victoria, Australia. PATIENTS: All ELBW live births of birth weight 500 to 999 g in the state in the calendar years indicated (1979-1980 [n = 351]; 1985-1987 [n = 560]; 1991-1992 [n = 429]; 1997 [n = 233]). Survivors were assessed at 2 years of age by pediatricians and psychologists blinded to perinatal details. The follow-up rates were high for each ELBW cohort (1979-1980: 100% [89 of 89]; 1985-1987: 100% [212 of 212]; 1991-1992: 98% [237 of 241]; 1997: 99% [168 of 170]). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Survival and quality-adjusted survival rates at 2 years of age. RESULTS: The survival rate to 2 years of age improved significantly between successive eras (absolute increase and 95% confidence interval: 1985-1987 vs 1979-1980, 12.5% and 6.3%-18.4%; 1991-1992 vs 1985-1987, 18.3% and 12.1%-24.4%; 1997 vs 1991-1992, 16.8% and 9.2%-23.9%), as did the quality-adjusted survival rate (absolute increase: 1985-1987 vs 1979-1980, 12.4%; 1991-1992 vs 1985-1987, 13.8%; 1997 vs 1991-1992, 13.2%). Overall, the survival rate increased from approximately 1 in 4 (25%) in 1979-1980 to 3 in 4 (73%) in 1997, and the quality-adjusted survival rate also increased threefold, from 19% in 1979-1980 to 59% in 1997. The biggest gains in survival and quality-adjusted survival in the most recent era were in infants in lighter birth-weight subgroups. CONCLUSION: The effectiveness of neonatal intensive care for ELBW infants in Victoria improved progressively from the late 1970s to the late 1990s.
CONTEXT: Although individual components of neonatal intensive care have proven efficacy, doubts remain about its overall effectiveness. OBJECTIVE: To determine the changes in effectiveness of neonatal intensive care for extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants over 2 decades. DESIGN: Population-based cohort study of consecutive ELBW infants born during 4 distinct eras: 1979-1980, 1985-1987, 1991-1992, and 1997, all followed to at least 2 years of age. SETTING: The state of Victoria, Australia. PATIENTS: All ELBW live births of birth weight 500 to 999 g in the state in the calendar years indicated (1979-1980 [n = 351]; 1985-1987 [n = 560]; 1991-1992 [n = 429]; 1997 [n = 233]). Survivors were assessed at 2 years of age by pediatricians and psychologists blinded to perinatal details. The follow-up rates were high for each ELBW cohort (1979-1980: 100% [89 of 89]; 1985-1987: 100% [212 of 212]; 1991-1992: 98% [237 of 241]; 1997: 99% [168 of 170]). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Survival and quality-adjusted survival rates at 2 years of age. RESULTS: The survival rate to 2 years of age improved significantly between successive eras (absolute increase and 95% confidence interval: 1985-1987 vs 1979-1980, 12.5% and 6.3%-18.4%; 1991-1992 vs 1985-1987, 18.3% and 12.1%-24.4%; 1997 vs 1991-1992, 16.8% and 9.2%-23.9%), as did the quality-adjusted survival rate (absolute increase: 1985-1987 vs 1979-1980, 12.4%; 1991-1992 vs 1985-1987, 13.8%; 1997 vs 1991-1992, 13.2%). Overall, the survival rate increased from approximately 1 in 4 (25%) in 1979-1980 to 3 in 4 (73%) in 1997, and the quality-adjusted survival rate also increased threefold, from 19% in 1979-1980 to 59% in 1997. The biggest gains in survival and quality-adjusted survival in the most recent era were in infants in lighter birth-weight subgroups. CONCLUSION: The effectiveness of neonatal intensive care for ELBW infants in Victoria improved progressively from the late 1970s to the late 1990s.
Authors: Regina A Gargus; Betty R Vohr; Jon E Tyson; Pamela High; Rosemary D Higgins; Lisa A Wrage; Kenneth Poole Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Betty R Vohr; Bonnie E Stephens; Rosemary D Higgins; Carla M Bann; Susan R Hintz; Abhik Das; Jamie E Newman; Myriam Peralta-Carcelen; Kimberly Yolton; Anna M Dusick; Patricia W Evans; Ricki F Goldstein; Richard A Ehrenkranz; Athina Pappas; Ira Adams-Chapman; Deanne E Wilson-Costello; Charles R Bauer; Anna Bodnar; Roy J Heyne; Yvonne E Vaucher; Robert G Dillard; Michael J Acarregui; Elisabeth C McGowan; Gary J Myers; Janell Fuller Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2012-03-14 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: Riccardo Navarra; Carlo Sestieri; Emanuela Conte; Rita Salomone; Peter A Mattei; Gian L Romani; Sergio Domizio; Massimo Caulo Journal: Neuroradiol J Date: 2016-02-25
Authors: Charles E Mercier; Michael S Dunn; Karla R Ferrelli; Diantha B Howard; Roger F Soll Journal: Neonatology Date: 2009-11-24 Impact factor: 4.035
Authors: Claire E Kelly; Deanne K Thompson; Jian Chen; Alexander Leemans; Christopher L Adamson; Terrie E Inder; Jeanie L Y Cheong; Lex W Doyle; Peter J Anderson Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2016-05-02 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Meena Rangan; Megan Banting; Lindsay Favotto; Louis A Schmidt; Saroj Saigal; Ryan J Van Lieshout Journal: J Dev Orig Health Dis Date: 2019-11-22 Impact factor: 2.401