Literature DB >> 14993110

Correlates of treatment-related decision-making capacity among middle-aged and older patients with schizophrenia.

Barton W Palmer1, Laura B Dunn, Paul S Appelbaum, Dilip V Jeste.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Antipsychotic medications constitute the backbone of treatment for schizophrenia. Current guidelines require clinicians to obtain patients' informed consent for treatment, but few empirical studies of the capacity of patients with schizophrenia for meaningful consent in this context exist. This issue may be particularly relevant for middle-aged and older patients, as the cognitive changes associated with normal aging may have an adverse impact on decision-making processes. We examined the range, stability, and correlates of treatment-related decisional capacity in this patient population.
METHODS: Participants included 59 middle-aged and older patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder and 38 normal comparison subjects. Baseline measures included the MacArthur Competence Assessment Tool for Treatment (MacCAT-T), psychopathology rating scales, and the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale. Patients also completed a neuropsychological test battery. The MacCAT-T was readministered to patients at a 1-month follow-up.
RESULTS: Relative to the comparison subjects, the patients had worse understanding of disclosed material; however, a wide range of performance was observed among patients. Variability in MacCAT-T performance was not predicted by demographic characteristics; there were no significant correlations between psychopathology ratings and MacCAT-T scores. Cognitive test scores were often significant correlates of capacity, particularly in terms of understanding and reasoning. The MacCAT-T scores were stable during the 1-month follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, middle-aged and older outpatients with schizophrenia had worse understanding of disclosed information than did normal comparison subjects, but such group comparisons obscure remarkable heterogeneity among patients. Differences in capacity appeared more related to cognitive functions than to severity of psychopathology. Such information about barriers to capacity may help in developing more effective methods of providing informed consent.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Mental Health Therapies; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14993110     DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.61.3.230

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry        ISSN: 0003-990X


  33 in total

1.  Screening for understanding of research in the inpatient psychiatry setting.

Authors:  Norval J Hickman; Judith J Prochaska; Laura B Dunn
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.742

2.  Capacity to make medical treatment decisions in multiple sclerosis: a potentially remediable deficit.

Authors:  Michael R Basso; Philip J Candilis; Jay Johnson; Courtney Ghormley; Dennis R Combs; Taeh Ward
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.475

3.  Ethical concerns in schizophrenia research: looking back and moving forward.

Authors:  Scott T Wilson; Barbara Stanley
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2005-11-10       Impact factor: 9.306

Review 4.  Emerging empirical evidence on the ethics of schizophrenia research.

Authors:  Laura B Dunn; Philip J Candilis; Laura Weiss Roberts
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 9.306

5.  Longitudinal consent-related abilities among research participants with schizophrenia: results from the CATIE study.

Authors:  T Scott Stroup; Paul S Appelbaum; Hongbin Gu; Spencer Hays; Marvin S Swartz; Richard S E Keefe; Scott Y Kim; Theo C Manschreck; Roger A Boshes; Joseph P McEvoy; Jeffrey A Lieberman
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 4.939

6.  Origination of medical advance directives among nursing home residents with and without serious mental illness.

Authors:  Xueya Cai; Peter Cram; Yue Li
Journal:  Psychiatr Serv       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.084

Review 7.  Assessment of Healthcare Decision-making Capacity.

Authors:  Barton W Palmer; Alexandrea L Harmell
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 2.813

8.  Meta-consent in research on decisional capacity: a "Catch-22"?

Authors:  Elyn R Saks; Laura B Dunn; Barton W Palmer
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2005-10-27       Impact factor: 9.306

Review 9.  Ethical, Legal and Forensic Issues in Geriatric Psychiatry.

Authors:  Rajesh R Tampi; Juan Young; Silpa Balachandran; Dhweeja Dasarathy; Deena Tampi
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 5.285

10.  Treatment decision-making capacity in non-consensual psychiatric treatment: a multicentre study.

Authors:  G Mandarelli; F Carabellese; G Parmigiani; F Bernardini; L Pauselli; R Quartesan; R Catanesi; S Ferracuti
Journal:  Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 6.892

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.