OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to determine whether the examination of color stimulated acoustic emission in the late phase of Levovist (SH U 508A; Schering AG, Berlin, Germany) enhancement is helpful in the discrimination between benign and malignant liver lesions. METHODS: Fifty-six patients with focal hepatic lesions were examined. Diagnosis of the lesions was confirmed by liver biopsy, computed tomography, or scintigraphy. Thirty-one patients had malignant liver lesions: hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 14), cholangiocellular carcinoma (n = 1), metastasis (n = 14), and lymphoma (n = 2). Twenty-five patients had benign lesions: focal nodular hyperplasia (n = 8), hepatic adenoma (n = 1), focal hyposteatosis or hypersteatosis (n = 6), hemangioma (n = 7), and regenerative cirrhotic nodules (n = 3). After a delay of 5 to 10 minutes without scanning, the liver was examined by color stimulated acoustic emission with a fast sweep of 1 to 3 seconds. RESULTS: All patients with homogeneous color stimulated acoustic emission in the late phase of Levovist enhancement had benign liver lesions (P < .001; specificity, 100%; sensitivity, 68%; positive predictive value, 100%; and negative predictive value, 79%). Eighty-one percent of the patients with nonenhancing lesions in the late phase surrounded by enhanced liver parenchyma had malignant liver lesions (P < .001; specificity, 72%; sensitivity, 94%; positive predictive value, 81%; and negative predictive value, 90%). Interobserver agreement (weighted kappa value) improved from 0.570 +/- 0.038 for baseline sonography to 0.918 +/- 0.028 for color stimulated acoustic emission sonography. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves for color stimulated acoustic emission sonography (0.927) was significantly higher than for baseline sonography (0.739; P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Color stimulated acoustic emission in the late phase of Levovist enhancement has a high specificity and sensitivity for differentiation between benign and malignant focal liver lesions.
OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to determine whether the examination of color stimulated acoustic emission in the late phase of Levovist (SH U 508A; Schering AG, Berlin, Germany) enhancement is helpful in the discrimination between benign and malignant liver lesions. METHODS: Fifty-six patients with focal hepatic lesions were examined. Diagnosis of the lesions was confirmed by liver biopsy, computed tomography, or scintigraphy. Thirty-one patients had malignant liver lesions: hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 14), cholangiocellular carcinoma (n = 1), metastasis (n = 14), and lymphoma (n = 2). Twenty-five patients had benign lesions: focal nodular hyperplasia (n = 8), hepatic adenoma (n = 1), focal hyposteatosis or hypersteatosis (n = 6), hemangioma (n = 7), and regenerative cirrhotic nodules (n = 3). After a delay of 5 to 10 minutes without scanning, the liver was examined by color stimulated acoustic emission with a fast sweep of 1 to 3 seconds. RESULTS: All patients with homogeneous color stimulated acoustic emission in the late phase of Levovist enhancement had benign liver lesions (P < .001; specificity, 100%; sensitivity, 68%; positive predictive value, 100%; and negative predictive value, 79%). Eighty-one percent of the patients with nonenhancing lesions in the late phase surrounded by enhanced liver parenchyma had malignant liver lesions (P < .001; specificity, 72%; sensitivity, 94%; positive predictive value, 81%; and negative predictive value, 90%). Interobserver agreement (weighted kappa value) improved from 0.570 +/- 0.038 for baseline sonography to 0.918 +/- 0.028 for color stimulated acoustic emission sonography. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curves for color stimulated acoustic emission sonography (0.927) was significantly higher than for baseline sonography (0.739; P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Color stimulated acoustic emission in the late phase of Levovist enhancement has a high specificity and sensitivity for differentiation between benign and malignant focal liver lesions.
Authors: Mirjana V Stojković; Vera M Artiko; Irena B Radoman; Slavko J Knezević; Snezana M Lukić; Mirko D Kerkez; Nebojsa S Lekić; Andrija A Antić; Marinko M Zuvela; Vitomir I Ranković; Milorad N Petrović; Dragana P Sobić; Vladimir B Obradović Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2009-07-14 Impact factor: 5.742