BACKGROUND: The frequency of hypospadias is not uniform worldwide. Several countries have reported an increase in its frequency at birth. Although a better ascertainment of the minor forms has been considered as an explanation, the potential effect of environmental endocrine disrupters has also been proposed. We studied the secular trend of hypospadias in Spain over the past 22 years, separating the minor and major forms. METHODS: We used data from the Spanish Collaborative Study of Congenital Malformations (ECEMC) registry, analyzing the frequency in two different periods: from 1978 to 1995, and from 1996 to 2002. To evaluate the "step" of the frequency between the two periods, we applied a parametric Student's t-test, and the nonparametric Mann-Whitney rank test. RESULTS: The birth frequency of isolated and total hypospadias was quite stable between 1978 and 1995. In 1996, it decreased dramatically in a step, essentially due to isolated cases with minor forms of hypospadias. Study of the geographical distribution by the 17 Spanish regions showed that the frequency step occurred in nearly all of them. CONCLUSIONS: It is difficult to consider that the observed decrease of the frequency of minor forms of hypospadias could be due to less accurate reporting of these minor forms in all 87 hospitals in the same year without any previous physician agreement. This decrease rather suggests a change in some product or exposure affecting the whole country. We think that the observed change in the frequency cannot be attributable to a lower exposure to endocrine disrupters or the voluntary interruption of gestation. Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
BACKGROUND: The frequency of hypospadias is not uniform worldwide. Several countries have reported an increase in its frequency at birth. Although a better ascertainment of the minor forms has been considered as an explanation, the potential effect of environmental endocrine disrupters has also been proposed. We studied the secular trend of hypospadias in Spain over the past 22 years, separating the minor and major forms. METHODS: We used data from the Spanish Collaborative Study of Congenital Malformations (ECEMC) registry, analyzing the frequency in two different periods: from 1978 to 1995, and from 1996 to 2002. To evaluate the "step" of the frequency between the two periods, we applied a parametric Student's t-test, and the nonparametric Mann-Whitney rank test. RESULTS: The birth frequency of isolated and total hypospadias was quite stable between 1978 and 1995. In 1996, it decreased dramatically in a step, essentially due to isolated cases with minor forms of hypospadias. Study of the geographical distribution by the 17 Spanish regions showed that the frequency step occurred in nearly all of them. CONCLUSIONS: It is difficult to consider that the observed decrease of the frequency of minor forms of hypospadias could be due to less accurate reporting of these minor forms in all 87 hospitals in the same year without any previous physician agreement. This decrease rather suggests a change in some product or exposure affecting the whole country. We think that the observed change in the frequency cannot be attributable to a lower exposure to endocrine disrupters or the voluntary interruption of gestation. Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Xiao Yu; Natasha Nassar; Pierpaolo Mastroiacovo; Mark Canfield; Boris Groisman; Eva Bermejo-Sánchez; Annukka Ritvanen; Sonja Kiuru-Kuhlefelt; Adriana Benavides; Antonin Sipek; Anna Pierini; Fabrizio Bianchi; Karin Källén; Miriam Gatt; Margery Morgan; David Tucker; M Aaurora Canessa; Rosa Gajardo; Osvaldo M Mutchinick; Elena Szabova; Melinda Csáky-Szunyogh; Giovanna Tagliabue; Janet D Cragan; Wendy N Nembhard; Anke Rissmann; Dorit Goetz; Carol Bower; Gareth Baynam; R Brian Lowry; Juan A Leon; Wei Luo; Jocelyn Rouleau; Ignacio Zarante; Nicolas Fernandez; Emmanuelle Amar; Saeed Dastgiri; Paolo Contiero; Laura E Martínez-de-Villarreal; Barry Borman; J E H Bergman; Hermien E K de Walle; Charlotte A Hobbs; Amy E Nance; A J Agopian Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2019-07-09 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Evanthia Diamanti-Kandarakis; Jean-Pierre Bourguignon; Linda C Giudice; Russ Hauser; Gail S Prins; Ana M Soto; R Thomas Zoeller; Andrea C Gore Journal: Endocr Rev Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 19.871
Authors: Jorieke E H Bergman; Maria Loane; Martine Vrijheid; Anna Pierini; Rien J M Nijman; Marie-Claude Addor; Ingeborg Barisic; Judit Béres; Paula Braz; Judith Budd; Virginia Delaney; Miriam Gatt; Babak Khoshnood; Kari Klungsøyr; Carmen Martos; Carmel Mullaney; Vera Nelen; Amanda J Neville; Mary O'Mahony; Annette Queisser-Luft; Hanitra Randrianaivo; Anke Rissmann; Catherine Rounding; David Tucker; Diana Wellesley; Natalya Zymak-Zakutnia; Marian K Bakker; Hermien E K de Walle Journal: World J Urol Date: 2015-02-25 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Mariana F Fernandez; Begoña Olmos; Alicia Granada; Maria José López-Espinosa; José-Manuel Molina-Molina; Juan Manuel Fernandez; Milagros Cruz; Fátima Olea-Serrano; Nicolás Olea Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 9.031