Literature DB >> 14991889

Prognostic value of sentinel lymph node biopsy in the pathologic staging of colorectal cancer patients.

Sergio Bertoglio1, Sergio Sandrucci, Pierluigi Percivale, Matteo Goss, Marco Gipponi, Luciano Moresco, Baudolino Mussa, Antonio Mussa.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Over the last decade, lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node (sN) biopsy have greatly increased the possibility of identifying nodal metastasis in clinically node-negative patients with melanoma and breast cancer, thus improving the accuracy of pathologic staging. Recently, sN biopsy has been applied also in colorectal cancer. This prospective study aimed to assess its feasibility and accuracy in predicting regional lymph nodes metastases in colorectal cancer patients as well as the impact on treatment decision-making.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Lymphatic mapping was accomplished by means of blue dye, which was intraoperatively injected into the subserosa overlying the tumor site in 26 patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery. Following bowel resection, the operative specimen was inspected to identify each blue-stained node, the sN, which was sent separately to the pathologist. One half of each sN was examined by multiple 200 microm sections, while the second half was examined by standard bi-valving technique with hematoxylin-eosin (H and E) staining; all the other regional non-sentinel nodes were routinely examined by standard bi-valving technique and H and E staining.
RESULTS: At least one sN was detected in 24 of 26 patients (92.3%); two patients with rectal cancer had no sN identified. Overall, 70 sN were retrieved into the operative specimens, with a mean of 2.9 sNs/patient, and 19 sNs were tumor-positive. An agreement between sN and regional lymph-node status was observed in 20 of 24 patients (83.4%). The sN was histologically negative in two of nine patients with positive regional nodes (sensitivity = 77.8%; false-negative rate of 22.2%); in two of seven patients with tumor-positive sN (28.6%), the sN was the exclusive site of regional nodal metastasis. The negative predictive value was 88.2% (15 of 17 patients), and the overall accuracy was 91.7% (22 of 24 patients). As regards the contribution to the detection of nodal metastasis according to the pathologic technique, standard H and E bi-valving technique detected 16 of 19 tumor-positive sNs (84.2%) while, by means of serial sectioning, metastases were detected in the remaining 3 of 19 sNs (15.8%).
CONCLUSIONS: The sN biopsy proved feasible, with a rather short learning curve. The focused analysis of the sN by means of serial sectioning improved the detection rate of nodal metastasis compared to standard bi-valving examination, so that a more accurate nodal staging should be expected; finally, an elective localization of metastasis within the sN was observed in almost one third of regional node-positive patients. Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14991889     DOI: 10.1002/jso.20030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0022-4790            Impact factor:   3.454


  10 in total

1.  Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Colon Cancer: an Institutional Experience.

Authors:  Naresh Kumar Saidha; Ritu Mehta; Munish Malhotra; A K Singh; Deepankar Kumar; Chandra Prakash Sharma
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-08-13

2.  Extended lymphadenectomy in colon cancer is debatable.

Authors:  Jamie Murphy; Tonia Young-Fadok
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Laparoscopic colon resection early in the learning curve: what is the appropriate setting?

Authors:  Daniel J Reichenbach; A Darrel Tackett; James Harris; Diego Camacho; Edward A Graviss; Brendan Dewan; Ashley Vavra; Anquonette Stiles; William E Fisher; F Charles Brunicardi; John F Sweeney
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 4.  Function preservation in rectal cancer surgery.

Authors:  Yoshihiro Moriya
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  [Sentinel lymph node biopsy in colorectal carcinoma].

Authors:  A Bembenek; S Gretschel; C Ulmer; P M Schlag
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 0.955

6.  Prognostic value of the detection of lymph node micrometastases in colon cancer.

Authors:  Carlos E Bosch Roig; Ester Roselló-Sastre; Sonia Alonso Hernández; Daniel Almenar Cubells; Enrique Grau Cardona; Natalia Camarasa Lillo; Daniel Bautista; Carmen Molins Palau
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 7.  What's wrong with sentinel node mapping in colon cancer?

Authors:  Ronan A Cahill
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Ex vivo localization and immunohistochemical detection of sentinel lymph node micrometastasis in patients with colorectal cancer can upgrade tumor staging.

Authors:  Fu-Long Wang; Fang Shen; De-Sen Wan; Zhen-Hai Lu; Li-Ren Li; Gong Chen; Xiao-Jun Wu; Pei-Rong Ding; Ling-Heng Kong; Zhi-Zhong Pan
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 2.644

9.  Review of histopathological and molecular prognostic features in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Ola Marzouk; John Schofield
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 10.  Could lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy provide oncological providence for local resectional techniques for colon cancer? A review of the literature.

Authors:  Ronan A Cahill; Joel Leroy; Jacques Marescaux
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 2.102

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.