Literature DB >> 14991853

Methodologic issues in the use of workers' compensation databases for the study of work injuries with days away from work. I. Sensitivity of case ascertainment.

Arthur Oleinick1, Brian Zaidman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Case ascertainment costs vary substantially between primary and secondary data sources. This review summarizes information on the sensitivity of state administrative databases in workers' compensation systems for the ascertainment of days-away-from-work (DAFW) work injuries for use in modeling studies.
METHODS: Review of the literature supplemented by data from governmental or organizational reports or produced for this report.
RESULTS: Employers currently appear to provide workers' compensation insurance coverage for 98.9% of wage and salary workers. Wage and salary jobs account for approximately 90% of jobs in the United States. In industries such as manufacturing, the fraction of covered jobs is probably closer to 98%. In Minnesota, the number of DAFW cases ascertained by the Bureau of Labor Statistics' annual survey of occupational injuries and illnesses is approximately 92-97% concordant with the number of wage compensation claims for injuries producing DAFW over the period 1992-2000, once adjustments are made to permit direct comparisons of the numbers. The workers' compensation databases provide information for more than 95% of the total DAFW resulting from work injuries. Covariate estimates are unaffected by this less than 5% loss because effects appear dependent on time from injury.
CONCLUSIONS: Statewide workers' compensation administrative databases can have substantial utility for epidemiologic study of work injuries with DAFW because of their size, using high sensitivity for case ascertainment as the evaluative criterion. Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14991853     DOI: 10.1002/ajim.10333

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ind Med        ISSN: 0271-3586            Impact factor:   2.214


  7 in total

1.  Occupational disease and workers' compensation: coverage, costs, and consequences.

Authors:  J Paul Leigh; John A Robbins
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.911

2.  Effects of residential location and work-commuting on long-term work disability.

Authors:  Z Joyce Fan; Michael P Foley; Eddy Rauser; David K Bonauto; Barbara A Silverstein
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2013-12

3.  Evaluating Clinical Practice Guidelines Based on Their Association with Return to Work in Administrative Claims Data.

Authors:  Eric T Roberts; Eva H DuGoff; Sara E Heins; David I Swedler; Renan C Castillo; Dorianne R Feldman; Stephen T Wegener; Vladimir Canudas-Romo; Gerard F Anderson
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Medical expenditures associated with nonfatal occupational injuries among immigrant and U.S.-born workers.

Authors:  Huiyun Xiang; Junxin Shi; Bo Lu; Krista Wheeler; Weiyan Zhao; J R Wilkins; Gary A Smith
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-08-20       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Employer reasons for failing to report eligible workers' compensation claims in the BLS survey of occupational injuries and illnesses.

Authors:  Christina L Rappin; Sara E Wuellner; David K Bonauto
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2016-03-11       Impact factor: 2.214

6.  Unreported workers' compensation claims to the BLS Survey of Occupational Injuries and Illnesses: Establishment factors.

Authors:  Sara E Wuellner; Darrin A Adams; David K Bonauto
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 2.214

7.  Analyzing Workers' Compensation Claims and Payments Made Using Data from a Large Insurance Provider.

Authors:  Navneet Kaur Baidwan; Nathan W Carroll; Bunyamin Ozaydin; Neeraj Puro
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.