Literature DB >> 14991241

Omission of bone scanning according to staging guidelines leads to futile therapy in non-small cell lung cancer.

Holger Schirrmeister1, Coskun Arslandemir, Gerhard Glatting, Regine Mayer-Steinacker, Martin Bommer, Karsten Dreinhöfer, Andreas Buck, Martin Hetzel.   

Abstract

The leading European and American professional societies recommend that bone scans (BS) should be performed in the staging of lung cancer only in those patients with bone pain. This prospective study investigated the sensitivity of conventional skeletal scintigraphy in detecting osseous metastases in patients with lung cancer and addressed the potential consequences of failure to use this method in the work-up of asymptomatic patients. Subsequent to initial diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer, 100 patients were examined and questioned regarding skeletal complaints. Two specialists in internal medicine decided whether they would recommend a bone scan on the basis of the clinical evaluation. Skeletal scintigraphy was then performed blinded to the findings of history and physical examination. The combined results of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the vertebral column, positron emission tomography (PET) of skeletal bone and the subsequent clinical course served as the gold standard for the identification of osseous metastases. Bone scintigraphy showed an 87% sensitivity in the detection of bone metastases. Failure to perform skeletal scintigraphy in asymptomatic patients reduced the sensitivity of the method, depending on the interpretation of the symptoms, to 19-39%. Without the findings of skeletal scintigraphy and the gold standard methods, 14-22% of patients would have undergone unnecessary surgery or neoadjuvant therapy. On this basis it is concluded that bone scans should not be omitted in asymptomatic patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14991241     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-004-1492-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  23 in total

1.  Pretreatment evaluation of non-small-cell lung cancer. The American Thoracic Society and The European Respiratory Society.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 21.405

2.  Descriptive epidemiology of low-back pain and its related medical care in the United States.

Authors:  R A Deyo; Y J Tsui-Wu
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Radioisotope scanning in the initial staging of bronchogenic carcinoma.

Authors:  R G Hooper; C R Beechler; M C Johnson
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1978-08

4.  Comparison of four chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Joan H Schiller; David Harrington; Chandra P Belani; Corey Langer; Alan Sandler; James Krook; Junming Zhu; David H Johnson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-01-10       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Detection of malignant bone tumors: MR imaging vs scintigraphy.

Authors:  J A Frank; A Ling; N J Patronas; J A Carrasquillo; K Horvath; A M Hickey; A J Dwyer
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Extrathoracic staging of bronchogenic carcinoma.

Authors:  A Salvatierra; C Baamonde; J M Llamas; F Cruz; J Lopez-Pujol
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 9.410

7.  Initial staging of non-small cell lung cancer: value of routine radioisotope bone scanning.

Authors:  F Michel; M Solèr; E Imhof; A P Perruchoud
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 9.139

8.  The first site of recurrence after complete resection in non-small-cell carcinoma of the lung. Comparison between pN0 disease and pN2 disease.

Authors:  T Yano; H Yokoyama; T Inoue; H Asoh; K Tayama; E Takai; Y Ichinose
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  The noninvasive staging of non-small cell lung cancer: the guidelines.

Authors:  Gerard A Silvestri; Lynn T Tanoue; Mitchell L Margolis; John Barker; Frank Detterbeck
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 10.  Noninvasive staging of non-small cell lung cancer: a review of the current evidence.

Authors:  Eric M Toloza; Linda Harpole; Douglas C McCrory
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 9.410

View more
  4 in total

1.  Skeletal metastases: what is the future role for nuclear medicine?

Authors:  Gary J R Cook
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 2.  Diagnosis of bone metastases: a meta-analysis comparing ¹⁸FDG PET, CT, MRI and bone scintigraphy.

Authors:  Hui-Lin Yang; Tao Liu; Xi-Ming Wang; Yong Xu; Sheng-Ming Deng
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Diagnostic imaging to detect and evaluate response to therapy in bone metastases from prostate cancer: current modalities and new horizons.

Authors:  Laura Evangelista; Francesco Bertoldo; Francesco Boccardo; Giario Conti; Ilario Menchi; Francesco Mungai; Umberto Ricardi; Emilio Bombardieri
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Mortality following bone metastasis and skeletal-related events among patients 65 years and above with lung cancer: A population-based analysis of U.S. Medicare beneficiaries, 1999-2006.

Authors:  Nalini Sathiakumar; Elizabeth Delzell; Michael A Morrisey; Carla Falkson; Mellissa Yong; Victoria Chia; Justin Blackburn; Tarun Arora; Meredith L Kilgore
Journal:  Lung India       Date:  2013-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.