Literature DB >> 14991133

[Determining myocardial viability in myocardial infarct. Comparison of single and multisclice MRI techniques with TurboFlash and TrueFISP sequences].

A Huber1, S O Schönberg, B Spannagl, J Rieber, V Klauss, M F Reiser.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy in imaging viability of the myocardium with a multislice inversions recovery 2D single shot TrueFISP sequence and an established inversion recovery TurboFlash sequence.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twelve patients with myocardial infarction were examined at a 1.5 tesla MR system (Sonata, Siemens, Medical Systems) 10 min after application of a single dose multihance (0,1 mmol/kg body weight) with a 2D multislice technique (inversion recovery single shot TrueFISP), that allows to image the entire short axis during one breathhold and a 2D single slice technique (inversion recovery TurboFlash), that requires one breathhold per slice. Signal intensity was determined in normal myocardium, in the infarcted myocardium and in the left ventricle. The contrast/noise ratio of normal and infarcted myocardium was determined. The areas of hyperintense infarction were compared for both sequence techniques.
RESULTS: The multislice single shot 2D IR-TrueFisp sequence has a lower contrast/noise ratio than the IR-TurboFlash sequence (mean values 6.9 vs. 12.5) for viable and non viable myocardium. The assessment of the volume of the infarction is possible with excellent correlation of both techniques (r=0.97, p <0.036). In addition, an assessment of the transmural extent of the infarction is possible with identical spatial resolution.
CONCLUSION: The inversions recovery 2D single shot TrueFisp technique allows for accurate detection of the infarction, for accurate determination of the area of the infarction and for assessment of the transmural extent of the infarction with high spatial resolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14991133     DOI: 10.1007/s00117-003-1007-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiologe        ISSN: 0033-832X            Impact factor:   0.635


  11 in total

1.  Assessment of myocardial viability with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Christoph Klein; Stephan G Nekolla; Frank M Bengel; Mitsuru Momose; Andrea Sammer; Felix Haas; Bernhard Schnackenburg; Wolfram Delius; Harald Mudra; Dieter Wolfram; Markus Schwaiger
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  [Assessment of myocardial viability in patients before revascularization].

Authors:  Luis Jesús Jiménez Borreguero; Rafael Ruiz-Salmerón
Journal:  Rev Esp Cardiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.753

3.  Hibernation and stunning of the myocardium.

Authors:  R A Kloner; K Przyklenk
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1991-12-26       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  The hibernating myocardium.

Authors:  S H Rahimtoola
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.749

5.  An improved MR imaging technique for the visualization of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  O P Simonetti; R J Kim; D S Fieno; H B Hillenbrand; E Wu; J M Bundy; J P Finn; R M Judd
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Positron emission tomography using fluorine-18 deoxyglucose in evaluation of coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  N Tamaki; Y Yonekura; K Yamashita; H Saji; Y Magata; M Senda; Y Konishi; K Hirata; T Ban; J Konishi
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1989-10-15       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Gadolinium cardiovascular magnetic resonance predicts reversible myocardial dysfunction and remodeling in patients with heart failure undergoing beta-blocker therapy.

Authors:  David Bello; Dipan J Shah; George M Farah; Silvia Di Luzio; Michele Parker; Maryl R Johnson; William G Cotts; Francis J Klocke; Robert O Bonow; Robert M Judd; Mihai Gheorghiade; Raymond J Kim
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-10-13       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Reason for discrepancies in identifying myocardial viability by thallium-201 redistribution, magnetic resonance imaging, and dobutamine echocardiography.

Authors:  José Zamorano; Juan Delgado; Carlos Almería; R Moreno; Miguel Gómez Sánchez; José Rodrigo; Cristina Fernández; Joaquin Ferreiros; Juan Rufilanchas; Luis Sánchez-Harguindey
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2002-09-01       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 9.  Role of thallium-201 and PET imaging in evaluation of myocardial viability and management of patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction.

Authors:  J Maddahi; H Schelbert; R Brunken; M Di Carli
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Identification and differentiation of resting myocardial ischemia and infarction in man with positron computed tomography, 18F-labeled fluorodeoxyglucose and N-13 ammonia.

Authors:  R C Marshall; J H Tillisch; M E Phelps; S C Huang; R Carson; E Henze; H R Schelbert
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  [Cardiac MR imaging in arrhythmogenic heart diseases].

Authors:  C K Böhm; T Papavassiliu; D J Dinter; S J Diehl; M Borggrefe; K W Neff
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 2.  Cardiac MRI: a central prognostic tool in myocardial fibrosis.

Authors:  Bharath Ambale-Venkatesh; João A C Lima
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 32.419

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.