Literature DB >> 14990671

Radiation disaster response: preparation and simulation experience at an academic medical center.

A Robert Schleipman1, Victor H Gerbaudo, Frank P Castronovo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: A mass casualty disaster drill involving the simulated explosion of a radiation dispersal device (dirty bomb) was performed with the participation of multiple hospitals, emergency responders, and governmental agencies. The exercise was designed to stress trauma service capacities, communications, safety, and logistic functions. We report our experience and critique of the planning, training, and execution of the exercise, with special attention to the integrated response of the Departments of Nuclear Medicine, Health Physics, and Emergency Medicine.
METHODS: The Health Physics Department presented multiple training sessions to the Emergency Medicine Department, Operating Room, and ancillary staff; reviewing basics of radiation biology and risk, protection standards, and detection of radiocontamination. Competency-based simulations using Geiger-Müller detectors and sealed sources were performed. Two nuclear medicine technologists played an important role in radiation discrimination-that is, assessment of radioactive contamination with survey meters and radionuclide identification based on gamma-spectroscopy of wipe smears from patients' clothing, skin, and orifices. Three Health Physics personnel and one senior Nuclear Medicine staff member were designated the radiation control officers for assigned teams triaging or treating patients. Patients were triaged and, when indicated, decontaminated.
RESULTS: Within a 2-h period, 21 simulated victims arrived at our institution's Emergency Room. Of these, 11 were randomized as noncontaminated, with 10 as contaminated. Decontamination procedures were implemented in a hazardous materials (HAZMAT) decontamination trailer and, for the 5 patients with simulated serious injuries, in a designated trauma room. A full debriefing took place at the conclusion of the exercise. Staff largely complied with appropriate radiation protection protocols, although decontamination areas were not effectively controlled. The encountered limitations included significant lapses in communications and logistics, lack of coordination in the flow of patients through the HAZMAT trailer, insufficient staff to treat acute patients in a radiation control area, additional personnel needed for transport, and insufficient radiation safety personnel to control each decontamination room.
CONCLUSION: Nuclear Medicine personnel are particularly well qualified to assist Health Physics and Emergency Medicine personnel in the preparation for, and management of, mass casualty radiation emergencies. Simulation exercises, though resource intensive, are essential to an institution's determination of response capability, performance, and coordination with outside agencies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14990671

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med Technol        ISSN: 0091-4916


  3 in total

1.  Local, regional and national responses for medical management of a radiological/nuclear incident.

Authors:  Nicholas Dainiak; Beata Skudlarska; Joseph Albanese
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2012-10-22       Impact factor: 2.658

2.  [Emergency room management of contaminated patients].

Authors:  P C Strohm; T O Hammer; K Kopp; V Knobloch; K Alawadi; H Bannasch; W Köstler; E Zipfel; N P Südkamp
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Imaging of Accidental Contamination by Fluorine-18 Solution: A Quick Troubleshooting Procedure.

Authors:  Kalevi Kairemo; Aki Kangasmäki
Journal:  Asia Ocean J Nucl Med Biol       Date:  2016
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.