Literature DB >> 14990598

Reflective testing: how useful is the practice of adding on tests by laboratory clinicians?

J R Paterson1, R Paterson.   

Abstract

AIMS: To investigate the clinical value and practice of reflective testing, a new term to describe the practice of adding on tests when reporting or clinically authorising results.
METHODS: A consultant medical biochemist collected over a calendar year (2001) copies of clinical biochemistry reports on samples to which he had added on either iron studies (iron, total iron binding capacity (TIBC), and percentage saturation), or vitamin D. Iron studies and vitamin D were added on when biochemical results, available clinical information, demographic data, and clinical experience-or combinations thereof-suggested the possibility of haemochromatosis or vitamin D deficiency, respectively. The number of reports that the consultant authorised was estimated for the same calendar year. The number and percentage of raised TIBC percentage saturation and low vitamin D results from the tests that were added on were collated.
RESULTS: Raised TIBC saturation values were found in 28 patients (18.7% of the iron studies added on), of whom 16 were subsequently genotyped, eight having a genotype consistent with haemochromatosis. Thirty one patients with vitamin D deficiency (23.1% of the vitamin D tests added on) were identified.
CONCLUSIONS: The addition of iron studies and vitamin D tests by a laboratory clinician, when reporting, resulted in the identification of patients with haemochromatosis and vitamin D deficiency. The practice of adding on tests should be called reflective testing, because it is discretionary and is based on the clinical judgement of a laboratory clinician in the interpretation of results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14990598      PMCID: PMC1770233          DOI: 10.1136/jcp.2003.010108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0021-9746            Impact factor:   3.411


  4 in total

Review 1.  The application of expert systems in the clinical laboratory.

Authors:  P Winkel
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 2.  Improving the utilization of clinical laboratory tests.

Authors:  A H Wu
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.431

Review 3.  Screening for hemochromatosis.

Authors:  C Q Edwards; J P Kushner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-06-03       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Screening for genetic haemochromatosis in blood samples with raised alanine aminotransferase.

Authors:  M Bhavnani; D Lloyd; A Bhattacharyya; J Marples; P Elton; M Worwood
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 23.059

  4 in total
  3 in total

1.  Reflective testing.

Authors:  W G Simpson; P J Twomey
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.411

2.  Reflex and reflective testing: progress, but much still to be done.

Authors:  Michael J Murphy
Journal:  Ann Clin Biochem       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 2.057

3.  Multicenter Survey of Physicians' Perception of Interpretative Commenting and Reflective Testing in Nigeria.

Authors:  Lucius Chidiebere Imoh; Chinelo Pamela Onyenekwu; Kenneth Ogar Inaku; Alexander Oghielu Abu; Chibuzo David Tagbo; Idris Yahaya Mohammed; Modupe Akinrele Kuti
Journal:  EJIFCC       Date:  2021-02-28
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.